2014
DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharps Injuries Amongst Healthcare Workers: Review of Incidence, Transmissions and Costs

Abstract: Sharps injuries remain a frequent threat amongst HCWs. The follow-up and treatment of sharps injuries and the deriving consequences represent a significant cost factor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
49
1
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
49
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately 80% of HCPs have been affected by NSIs [30]. Various authors attributed the vulnerability of HCPs to BBP from NSIs to various reasons, including:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 80% of HCPs have been affected by NSIs [30]. Various authors attributed the vulnerability of HCPs to BBP from NSIs to various reasons, including:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Center for Disease Control and Prevention investigated 208 dentistry exposures (including subcutaneous, mucous membrane, and long-term skin exposure) reported between 1995 and 2001, in which 13% were positive for HIV source which led to serum changes since 75% of the exposed people received three PEP regimens for varying times [5]. Moreover, reports suggest that more than 3 million medical employees experience occupational exposure to sharp and cutting objects annually, leading to 16,000 cases of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, 66,000 cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and 1000 cases of HIV infection [9]. Health and medical employees, especially physicians and dentists, are at two major risks regarding the infectious diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of reported OD cases among healthcare personnel in Germany declined over the time possibly due to improved blood-borne pathogen handling practices. Guidelines have been issued since 2000 that aim to prevent exposure to blood, for example, from NSI [11]. In the mid-1990s it came to a strong increase in reported ODs, probably in many cases linked to old cases, as a result of increased investigations since the mid-1990s in Germany [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Needlestick injuries (NSI) are the most frequently reported occupational accidents in healthcare [13]. The results of epidemiological studies indicate that most of HCWs (80%) have been affected by NSI, and many such injuries remain unreported [11]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%