Sharing Family Life Information Through Video Calls and Other Information and Communication Technologies and the Association With Family Well-Being: Population-Based Survey

Abstract

BackgroundThe use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) for information sharing among family members is increasing dramatically. However, little is known about the associated factors and the influence on family well-being.ObjectiveThe authors investigated the pattern and social determinants of family life information sharing with family and the associations of different methods of sharing with perceived family health, happiness, and harmony (3Hs) in Hong Kong, where mobile phone ownership and Internet access are among the most prevalent, easiest, and fastest in the world.MethodsA territory-wide population-based telephone survey was conducted from January to August 2016 on different methods of family life information (ie, information related to family communication, relationships with family members, emotion and stress management) sharing with family members, including face-to-face, phone, instant messaging (IM), social media sites, video calls, and email. Family well-being was assessed by three single items on perceived family health, happiness, and harmony, with higher scores indicating better family well-being. Adjusted prevalence ratios were used to assess the associations of sociodemographic factors with family life information sharing, and adjusted beta coefficients for family well-being.ResultsOf 2017 respondents, face-to-face was the most common method to share family life information (74.45%, 1502/2017), followed by IM (40.86%, 824/2017), phone (28.10%, 567/2017), social media sites (11.91%, 240/2017), video calls (5.89%, 119/2017), and email (5.48%, 111/2017). Younger age and higher education were associated with the use of any (at least one) method, face-to-face, IM, and social media sites for sharing family life information (all P for trend <.01). Higher education was most strongly associated with the use of video calls (adjusted prevalence ratio=5.61, 95% CI 2.29-13.74). Higher household income was significantly associated with the use of any method, face-to-face, and IM (all P for trend <.05). Sharing family life information was associated with a higher level of perceived family well-being (beta=0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.75), especially by face-to-face (beta=0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.80) and video calls (beta=0.34, 95% CI 0.04-0.65). The combination of face-to-face and video calls was most strongly associated with a higher level of perceived family well-being (beta=0.81, 95% CI 0.45-1.16).ConclusionsThe differential use of ICTs to share family life information was observed. The prevalence of video calls was low, but associated with much better family well-being. The results need to be confirmed by prospective and intervention studies to promote the use of video calls to communicate and share information with family, particularly in disadvantaged groups.

Prospective bride interpersonal communication Judging from the Gender: Are there any differences?

“…Yang, Neustaedter, & Schiphorst, 2017, May;Sirin, & Deniz, 2016;Eğeci, & Gençöz, 2006). Kesejahteraan dan keharmonisan rumah tangga dapat terjalin dan tercipta dengan adanya komunikasi interpersonal yang baik dari masing-masing anggota keluarga itu sendiri, terutama komunikasi yang terjalin antara suami dan istri Sincihu, Maramis, & Rezki, 2018;Shen, Wang, Chu, Wan, Viswanath, Chan, & Lam, 2017 Berkomunikasi artinya menyampaikan pesan kepada orang lain. Pesan komunikasi dapat mempunyai banyak bentuk, baik dalam bentuk verbal/lisan dan tulisan serta dalam bentuk komunikasi secara nonverbal/tanpa kata (DeVito, 2011).…”

The lived experience of Indonesian nurses in Kuwait: A phenomenological study

“…Making phone calls and using other means of communication, including social media, is a much cheaper way to get in touch with families at home. Previous studies reported that the use of smartphones as a family life communication tool was associated with family wellbeinghealth, happiness, and harmony (Guo et al, 2019;Shen et al, 2017). Furthermore, maintaining family functions and effectively coping with family problems may support the survival of nurse migrants in other counties.…”

The Association Between Electronic Device Use During Family Time and Family Well-Being: Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study

“…Respondents with higher SES status may use eDevice more because of longer work-related use. In our previous study, respondents with higher SES status used eDevice more frequently for health and family information seeking and sharing [ 24 ], and communicated with family members more via phone calls, instant messaging (IM), and video calls [ 9 , 10 ]. Higher SES status respondents had higher access to eDevice, which may also lead to greater use [ 24 ].…”