2008
DOI: 10.22495/cocv6i1c4p2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shareholder coalitions, voting power, and dividend policy: New evidence from Tunisia

Abstract: This paper examines the possible association between the voting power of large shareholders and dividend payout policy for a panel of Tunisian firms over the period 1998-2004. The results show a negative relationship between the control stake of the dominant shareholder and payout rates. In contrast, the presence of another large shareholder affects the payout ratio positively. Our results also indicate that different owner types in control influence dividend policy differently. In particular, the control stak… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tunisian companies' internal governance mechanism can be described as characterized by large shareholders' direct control. According to Guizani et al (2008), for a sample of 51 Tunisian companies over the period 1998-2004, the voting power of the biggest shareholder is quite high (71 percent) making him very powerful. The agency costs which arise within Tunisian companies are initiated by large shareholders desiring to dilute the wealth of minority shareholders.…”
Section: The Influence Of Ownership Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tunisian companies' internal governance mechanism can be described as characterized by large shareholders' direct control. According to Guizani et al (2008), for a sample of 51 Tunisian companies over the period 1998-2004, the voting power of the biggest shareholder is quite high (71 percent) making him very powerful. The agency costs which arise within Tunisian companies are initiated by large shareholders desiring to dilute the wealth of minority shareholders.…”
Section: The Influence Of Ownership Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the former variable the Tunisian context is concentrated and the control is often in the hand of the first largest shareholder (Guizani et al, 2008). This variable is defined as the fraction of shares held by the largest shareholder (CONC), families (FAM) and institutional investors (INST).…”
Section: Moderated Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using cross-sectional sample of Czech firms, Bena and Hanousek (2008) showed that concentrated shareholders extract private benefits at the expense of the small shareholders. For Tunisian firms, Guizani et al (2008) and Kouki and Guizani (2009) find that the voting power of the largest shareholder is associated with low payout ratios. Furthermore, firms with majority control distribute low fraction of their benefits as dividend then their counterparts with shared control.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue that the Tunisian context offers an interesting setting in which to explore this issue. According to Guizani et al (2009) , for a sample of 51 Tunisian companies over the period 1998 -2004, the voting power of the largest shareholder is quite high (71 per cent), making him very powerful. The second and the third largest shareholders have on average 11 and 9 per cent of the voting power, respectively.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%