2006
DOI: 10.1504/ijiscm.2006.011197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shared services: a conceptual model for adoption, implementation and use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are not the first to highlight this need. The lack of maturity of shared services research has been recognized by other researchers over the years [e.g., Borman, 2008a;Craike and Singh, 2006;Ulbrich, 2006;, but still shared services is not well understood. Therefore, this study contributes to laying a foundation for advancing the understanding of shared services from an IS perspective by synthesizing the current literature, by developing conceptual frameworks, and by proposing a research agenda.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are not the first to highlight this need. The lack of maturity of shared services research has been recognized by other researchers over the years [e.g., Borman, 2008a;Craike and Singh, 2006;Ulbrich, 2006;, but still shared services is not well understood. Therefore, this study contributes to laying a foundation for advancing the understanding of shared services from an IS perspective by synthesizing the current literature, by developing conceptual frameworks, and by proposing a research agenda.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conceptualize the overall implementation success as the extent to which a firm achieves higher efficiency of support activity operations and ultimately reaches higher organizational performance. Indeed, success depends on the particular stage in maturity, and hence, this may differ radically along the implementation and the subsequent use phase (Craike and Singh, 2006). This study examines the implementation success when an SSC is able to start performing its responsibilities for the relevant customers in the firm.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the literature is characterized by a few conceptual studies describing implementation stages and guidelines (e.g. Craike and Singh, 2006; Davis, 2005;) as well as some explorative case studies. For example, Gospel and Sako (2010) explored the cases of Proctor & Gamble and Unilever and identified the firms’ reshaping capabilities as success factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, organizations of all sizes -in terms of revenue, employees and operating units-are realizing shared services benefits (Sutcliff, 2003). SSCs are also designed to promote innovation (Craike and Singh, 2006) by establishing corporate-level functional groups to provide specialized services (Kaplan and Winby, 2009). With this initiative, companies also aim to optimize operational costs and knowledge creation from diverse, multiple international operations (Lemagnen, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%