1989
DOI: 10.1177/0002716289505001004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaping and Sharing Pacific Dynamism

Abstract: This article attempts to elucidate the underlying considerations and calculations of one of the major actors of the Pacific region, Japan, in shaping and sharing the much vaunted Pacific dynamism. Keeping in mind the enormous economic vigor accompanied by a measure of uncertainty in Pacific international relations, the article attempts to analyze from a Japanese perspective the current configuration of ideas and practices unfolding in the region. First, the major features of Pacific dynamism are delineated. Se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, why could not a division of labor be worked out so that each country could pursue its comparative advantage (the Japanese in manufacturing, the Americans in services)? "Bigemony" is the central feature of this school (Inoguchi, 1989), as exemplified recently by Japan's contributions to stabilizing Asian currency markets against the volatility of the U.S. dollar (WuDunn, 1996). Tokyo's role increases but so do the safety and thus attractiveness of investment in U.S. government instruments.…”
Section: Apec: Competing Visionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, why could not a division of labor be worked out so that each country could pursue its comparative advantage (the Japanese in manufacturing, the Americans in services)? "Bigemony" is the central feature of this school (Inoguchi, 1989), as exemplified recently by Japan's contributions to stabilizing Asian currency markets against the volatility of the U.S. dollar (WuDunn, 1996). Tokyo's role increases but so do the safety and thus attractiveness of investment in U.S. government instruments.…”
Section: Apec: Competing Visionsmentioning
confidence: 99%