2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape sensing methods: Review and experimental comparison on a wing-shaped plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first example [1], a wing-shaped cantilevered plate is considered (Figure 3(a)). e material is an aluminum alloy (Young's modulus E � 72017 MPa, Poisson's ratio ] � 0.325).…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first example [1], a wing-shaped cantilevered plate is considered (Figure 3(a)). e material is an aluminum alloy (Young's modulus E � 72017 MPa, Poisson's ratio ] � 0.325).…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing shape-sensing methods can be classified into four categories based on different approaches [1]: (1) numerical integration of experimental strains, (2) use of global or piecewise continuous basis functions to approximate the displacement field, (3) application of neural networks, and (4) use of variational approaches. Most of the methods based on the integration of measured strains deal with beam problems and make use of the classical beam equations [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these techniques were recently compared to iFEM methodology for shape sensing of composite wing box [ 11 ], where it was demonstrated that the iFEM predicts better and more accurate deformed shapes than Ko theory [ 6 ] and modal methods [ 8 ]. Moreover, an extensive literature review study of iFEM and other shape-sensing methods can be found in [ 12 ]. Herein, we report only those recently published within the context of iFEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many types of inverse problems and their applications have been proposed, few researchers have dealt with the deformation sensing of the wing shape. The current methods used to sense the wing shape can be divided into two categories [ 10 ]: one category focuses on the deformation sensing of the skin comprised of plate/shell structures to reflect the deformation of the wing shape and the other category emphasizes on the deformation sensing of a wing frame made of beam structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Timoshenko beam theory, Gherlone et al analyzed the displacement field of a constant cross-section beam, consequently constructing the relationship between the displacement and the surface strain data through iFEM [ 27 , 28 ]. Furthermore, Gherlone et al conducted a comparative research on the aforementioned three shape sensing approaches: the iFEM, the modal transformation method and the Ko’s Displacement Theory [ 10 ]. It is found that the iFEM method is slightly more accurate and attractive than the other two methods for shape sensing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%