2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20092685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isogeometric iFEM Analysis of Thin Shell Structures

Abstract: Shape sensing is one of most crucial components of typical structural health monitoring systems and has become a promising technology for future large-scale engineering structures to achieve significant improvement in their safety, reliability, and affordability. The inverse finite element method (iFEM) is an innovative shape-sensing technique that was introduced to perform three-dimensional displacement reconstruction of structures using in situ surface strain measurements. Moreover, isogeometric analysis (IG… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that an exact inverse is not possible since the fiber strain calculation using Equation (29) is irreversible. Previous studies have proposed the inverse method using least squares for plates [ 16 ], using inverse FEM (iFEM) for shells and plates [ 17 ] and, recently, using inverse IGA-iFEM for shells with strain gauge rosettes [ 36 ]. However, our formulations of integrated IGA and DFOS presented in Section 2 and the following inverse method are substantially different since our method explicitly considers the geometry of the fiber and does not impose any restriction on the location or resolution of sampling points.…”
Section: Estimation Of Boundary Conditions Using Inverse Igamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that an exact inverse is not possible since the fiber strain calculation using Equation (29) is irreversible. Previous studies have proposed the inverse method using least squares for plates [ 16 ], using inverse FEM (iFEM) for shells and plates [ 17 ] and, recently, using inverse IGA-iFEM for shells with strain gauge rosettes [ 36 ]. However, our formulations of integrated IGA and DFOS presented in Section 2 and the following inverse method are substantially different since our method explicitly considers the geometry of the fiber and does not impose any restriction on the location or resolution of sampling points.…”
Section: Estimation Of Boundary Conditions Using Inverse Igamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have been recently assessed with each other on a comparative study [ 33 ], demonstrating how the iQS4 is more accurate than the iMIN3 for plane problems, while, in the case of curved structures, the best accuracy is archived by the iCS8. Then, other formulations exploit a combined use of iFEM and the Refined Zig-Zag theory (RZT) to compute the through-the-thickness displacement field on composite structures [ 34 , 35 ], while, the combination of isogeometric analysis and iFEM is beneficial for large non-linear deformations [ 36 ]. Finally, the iFEM was also recently extended to damage identification [ 30 , 37 , 38 , 39 ] by considering that discrepancies between the physical structure and the iFEM model generate wrong displacement and strain field reconstructions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinematic relations are obtained by combining the kinematics assumptions of Mindlin plate theory and of a solid shell. Most recently, Kefal and Oterkus [ 11 ] presented an isogeometric iFEM methodology for shape-sensing analyses of complex thin plate and shell structures. Zhao et al [ 12 ] proposed a new iFEM formulation for reconstructing the displacement field of variable cross-section beams based on isogeometric analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%