2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00163-010-0088-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape detection with vision: implementing shape grammars in conceptual design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, it attempts to describe the path that designers have drawn in order to acquire an understanding of how shapes and elements are manipulated while exploring design alternatives. These shape rules reflect the types of shape transformations employed by ICED19 designers (Jowers et al, 2010). "A shape rule is a rule of replacement of the shape A in B, where A and B are two shapes" (Prats et al, 2009).…”
Section: Definition Of Shape Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, it attempts to describe the path that designers have drawn in order to acquire an understanding of how shapes and elements are manipulated while exploring design alternatives. These shape rules reflect the types of shape transformations employed by ICED19 designers (Jowers et al, 2010). "A shape rule is a rule of replacement of the shape A in B, where A and B are two shapes" (Prats et al, 2009).…”
Section: Definition Of Shape Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, implementations that support emergence in parametric grammars using rectilinear shapes, for example, Grasl and Economou (2013) are not included. Other implementations that allow emergence, such as those based on bitmap representations (Jowers et al, 2010), are not included because they represent shapes using discrete pixels, essentially U 02 which, again, limits their extensibility.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although each one uses different representations for shapes and different approaches for part embeddings, they all treat shapes that contain straight lines, circular arcs, or free-form curves or all, equally such that the shape representations become invariant to constituting analytical forms. They either use some registration points as vertices to shape graphs to resolve structure and perform part matchings for graph edges (Keles et al, 2010; Grasl & Economou, 2013); use pixel-based representation and image processing algorithms (Jowers et al, 2010); use weighted representation of shapes and evolutionary optimization algorithms (Keles et al, 2012; Keles, 2015). In all these approaches, shapes are not treated as a composition of a set of pre-defined analytical forms but treated as continuous entities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%