2016 39th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/mipro.2016.7522348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape and texture combined face recognition for detection of forged ID documents

Abstract: Please check the manuscript for details of any other licences that may have been applied and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. You may not engage in further distribution of the material for any profitmaking activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute both the url (http://uhra.herts.ac.uk/) and the content of this paper for research or private study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MFDA technique uses random subspace sampling [93] to construct multiple lower-dimensional feature subspaces, and bagging [94] to select subsets of training samples for LDA that contain inter-class pairs near the classification boundary to increase the discriminative ability of the representation. Dense SIFT descriptors were also used in [95] as texture features, and combined with shape features in the form of relative distances between pairs of facial landmarks. This combination of shape and texture features was further processed using multiple PCA+LDA transformations.…”
Section: Hybrid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MFDA technique uses random subspace sampling [93] to construct multiple lower-dimensional feature subspaces, and bagging [94] to select subsets of training samples for LDA that contain inter-class pairs near the classification boundary to increase the discriminative ability of the representation. Dense SIFT descriptors were also used in [95] as texture features, and combined with shape features in the form of relative distances between pairs of facial landmarks. This combination of shape and texture features was further processed using multiple PCA+LDA transformations.…”
Section: Hybrid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representative methods such as principal component analysis and support vector machines (SVM) also emerged during this period. The existing methods can be roughly divided into several factions: based on geometric features, based on correlation matching, based on subspace learning, based on statistical methods and based on neural network [2]. At present, the mainstream face recognition models are mainly trained based on deep learning methods.…”
Section: Figure 2 the Face Recognition Flow Chartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a variety of facial traits, traditional approaches frequently struggle (Trigueros et al, 2018), with findings that are erroneous due to lighting and image variations (Xin & Wang, 2019). By focusing on image histograms as a complementary feature alongside CNN-based models, it will aim to mitigate these challenges and improve the overall performance of gender classification systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%