Shame-Focused Attitudes Toward Mental Health Problems

Hampton, Nan Zhang; Sharp, Seneca E.

doi:10.1177/0034355213501722

Cited by 27 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 90 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The majority of the studies relied on data obtained from samples of college students (n = 9; N.-Y. Choi & Miller, 2014;Hampton & Sharp, 2014;P. Y. Kim & Lee, 2014; E.-J.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2013.

Wei¹,

Carrera²,

Li³

2014

Asian American Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This 2014 review of Asian American psychology is the sixth review in the series. It includes 316 articles that met the inclusion criteria established by the past five annual reviews. Featured articles were derived from three sources: 137 were generated via the search term "Asian American" in PyscINFO, 111 were generated via a search for specific Asian American ethnic groups, and 32 were generated via author searches of articles that met the inclusion criteria. The top primary topic was health and health-related behaviors, the most frequently employed study design was crosssectional, and the most studied Asian American ethnic group was Chinese. This year's review includes information on the target population of the primary topic, the age range and developmental period of participants, and whether the study design was cross-sectional or longitudinal. It also identifies top authors and journals contributing to the 2014 annual review. These new features reveal that the most common target population of the primary topic was Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to Su Yeong Kim, Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, 108 E Dean Keeton St., Stop A2702, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712. su.yeong.kim@utexas.edu. HHS Public Access Author manuscriptAsian Am J Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01. Published in final edited form as:Asian Am J Psychol. 2015 December ; 6(4): 291-332. doi:10.1037/aap0000031. Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript youths; studies most commonly included emerging adults ages 18-25; cross-sectional study design was employed more often than longitudinal design; the top contributor to the 2014 review was Stephen Chen, who authored the highest number of papers included; and the Asian American Journal of Psychology generated the highest number of publications for this review. Keywords review; Asian Americans, 2014The annual review of Asian American psychology facilitates a comprehensive, year-to-year understanding of the field by summarizing the major research topics and methodology used in Asian American psychology. Comparison of multiple annual reviews reveals past, current, and emerging trends. Illuminating these trends can be informative for new and experienced scholars alike, who can utilize the reviews to synthesize past and current research. This will help them identify emerging trends in order to plan future research that will make a meaningful contribution to scholarship on Asian American psychology. The present annual review uses the format established by the past five annual reviews, with the addition of new features for future annual reviews to consider. Like past reviews, the current issue presents major trends by primary topic, methodological design, and participant characteristics (e.g., average age and ethnicity). This review contributes a developmental perspective by including age range and developmental period in our categorization of participants, and by considering cross-...

show abstract

“…The majority of the studies relied on data obtained from samples of college students (n = 9; N.-Y. Choi & Miller, 2014;Hampton & Sharp, 2014;P. Y. Kim & Lee, 2014; E.-J.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2013.

Wei¹,

Carrera²,

Li³

2014

Asian American Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Other studies have found contradictory evidence. For instance, Hampton and Sharp (2014) reported that men and women had similar, moderate levels of external (i.e., community shame/stigma and family shame/stigma), internal, and reflective (i.e., family reflective and self-reflective) shame regarding mental health issues. The current findings in support of factorial invariance of the MSRI-21 suggest that men and women share similar interpretations of the constructs measured by the inventory.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of note, previous research has found differences among ethnic groups in their propensity to experience shame. For instance, Hampton and Sharp (2014) found that Latinos scored highest on internal shame, followed by Caucasians and Asian Americans. Further, a recent study of ethnic differences in attitudes toward mental illness found that, compared with Europeans, Asians reported greater stigma toward and desired greater social distances from individuals with depression (Shamblaw, Botha, & Dozois, 2015).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factor structure, factorial invariance, and validity of the Multidimensional Shame-Related Response Inventory-21 (MSRI-21).

Garcia¹,

Acosta²,

Pirani³

et al. 2017

Journal of Counseling Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We describe 2 studies designed to evaluate scores on the Multidimensional Shame-related Response Inventory-21 (MSRI-21), a recently developed instrument that measures affective and behavioral responses to shame. The inventory assesses shame-related responses in 3 categories: negative self-evaluation, fear of social consequences, and maladaptive behavior tendency. For Study 1, (N = 743) undergraduates completed the MSRI-21. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the validity of the MSRI-21 3-factor structure. Latent variable modeling of coefficient-α provided strong evidence for the internal consistency of scores on each scale. In Study 2, (N = 540) undergraduates completed the instrument along with 5 concurrent measures chosen for clinical significance. Achievement of factorial invariance supported the use of MSRI-21 scale scores to make valid mean comparisons across gender. In addition, MSRI-21 scale scores were associated as expected with scores on measures of self-harm, suicide, and other risk factors. Taken together, results of 2 studies support the internal consistency reliability, factorial validity, factorial invariance, and convergent validity of scores on the MSRI-21. Further work is needed to assess the temporal stability of the MSRI-21 scale scores, invariance across clinical status and other groupings, item-level measurement properties, and viability in highly symptomatic samples.

show abstract

“…One of the reasons for this can be the nature of shame as discussed in some of the research with migrants and refugees in HICs as well as with general populations in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) in Asia and Southeast Asia. Hampton and sharp ( 24 ) have explored the nature of shame quite comprehensively using a framework of external, internal and reflective shame to argue that mental health systems, professionals, and researchers need to recognize and mediate the effects of shame on individuals from diverse cultures if they wish to ensure effective management of mental health issues. Hechanova and Waedle ( 14 ) suggest that shame related reasons for low access to mental health systems could be due to several reasons.…”

Section: Key Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural Diversity and Mental Health: Considerations for Policy and Practice

Gopalkrishnan

2018

Front. Public Health

246

181

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to explore some of the key considerations that lie at the intersection of cultural diversity and mental health. Mental health providers and professionals across the world have to work with clients that are often from cultures other than their own. The differences in cultures have a range of implications for mental health practice, ranging from the ways that people view health and illness, to treatment seeking patterns, the nature of the therapeutic relationship and issues of racism and discrimination. This paper will excavate some of these considerations with a view to raising possible ways in which mental health systems and professionals can engage across cultures more equitably and sustainably.

show abstract

Shame-Focused Attitudes Toward Mental Health Problems

Abstract: Attitude toward mental illness has been an important research area in rehabilitation counseling for several decades (

Cited by 27 publications

References 90 publications

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2013.

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2013.

Factor structure, factorial invariance, and validity of the Multidimensional Shame-Related Response Inventory-21 (MSRI-21).

Cultural Diversity and Mental Health: Considerations for Policy and Practice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About