2018
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sham sleep feedback delivered via actigraphy biases daytime symptom reports in people with insomnia: Implications for insomnia disorder and wearable devices

Abstract: This study investigated whether providing sham feedback about sleep to individuals with insomnia influenced daytime symptom reports, sleep-related attentional bias and psychomotor vigilance. Sixty-three participants meeting DSM-5 criteria for insomnia disorder were recruited from the community. Following baseline assessments and actigraphy briefing, participants were randomised to receive next-day sham feedback on sleep quality ("positive" vs. "negative" sleep efficiency condition). Feedback was delivered at h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
24
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For patients who overestimate sleep quantity, objective feedback may not be beneficial or may be even harmful. In fact, Gavriloff et al (2018) showed that negative feedback about sleep can adversely affect patients' perceptions of daytime functioning. This can subsequently trigger distress through cognitive processes and exacerbate sleep impairment (Harvey, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients who overestimate sleep quantity, objective feedback may not be beneficial or may be even harmful. In fact, Gavriloff et al (2018) showed that negative feedback about sleep can adversely affect patients' perceptions of daytime functioning. This can subsequently trigger distress through cognitive processes and exacerbate sleep impairment (Harvey, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective sleep quality can be especially informative in populations with extremities in subjective sleep experience that are more susceptible to sleep disturbance. For instance, D Gavriloff, B Sheaves, A Juss, CA Espie, CB Miller and SD Kyle [63] in a recent paper showed that providing sham feedback to patients with insomnia influenced their daytime symptoms and cognitive performance such as attention and vigilance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon can be particularly prevalent amongst university students since the pressure for academic performance in this population is exceptionally high. The possible overestimation of the importance of one's subjective sleep quality can even lead to placebo or nocebo effects on cognitive performance 1,2 . However, scientific evidence on the relationship between experienced subjective sleep quality and cognition is still inconclusive [3][4][5][6][7] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stepanski et al 7 showed that, within insomniac patients, the decisive factor of whether a patient seeks medication is their subjective evaluation of their sleep quality and daytime functioning. Furthermore, Gavriloff et al 1 found that providing sham feedback about their sleep to patients with insomnia influenced their daytime symptoms and performance in attention and vigilance tasks. Similarly, in a placebo sleep study, young adults were randomly told they had below or above average sleep quality based on their brainwaves and other psychophysiological measures 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%