2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2018.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shall we abandon sedimentation methods for particle size analysis in soils?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…diameter < 0.075 mm) and the sieving procedure for the remaining part of the samples. To investigate the possible influence of pedogenic processes (accumulation of organic matter and secondary calcite) on grain size distribution, eight additional soil samples were tested using the laser diffraction method (LDM; Alen, 1981; Bittelli et al , 2019), with the Analysette 22 NanoTec Laser Particle Sizer by Fritsch. Five of these samples, in the clay–fine silt range (0.19–18.61 µm, Table 1), were analyzed before and after pretreatment with hydrogen peroxide (10 % solution) to remove organic matter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…diameter < 0.075 mm) and the sieving procedure for the remaining part of the samples. To investigate the possible influence of pedogenic processes (accumulation of organic matter and secondary calcite) on grain size distribution, eight additional soil samples were tested using the laser diffraction method (LDM; Alen, 1981; Bittelli et al , 2019), with the Analysette 22 NanoTec Laser Particle Sizer by Fritsch. Five of these samples, in the clay–fine silt range (0.19–18.61 µm, Table 1), were analyzed before and after pretreatment with hydrogen peroxide (10 % solution) to remove organic matter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining fraction of soil sample was air‐dried, sieved to 2 mm and shaken for 12 hr at 80 rpm in 2% sodium hexametaphosphate solution for particle size distribution determination by the laser diffraction method (Mastersizer 2000, Malvern Instruments, Malvern, United Kingdom). A dedicated algorithm was used to convert diffraction values into pipette values (Bittelli et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other soil fraction (one-third) was air-dried and sieved through a 0.5-mm mesh to determine the organic C and total nitrogen (TN) contents by the flash combustion method using a CNS Elemental analyser (Vario Max; Analysensysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany), following an acid pretreatment for inorganic C removal. The soil texture was determined with laser diffraction (Malvern Mastersizer 2000; Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK) of 2-mm sieved samples that were previously dispersed in a 2% sodium hexametaphosphate solution and shaken for 12 hr at 80 rpm (Bittelli et al, 2019). The equivalent soil mass (ESM) method (VandenBygaart & Angers, 2006) was applied to normalize the effects of tillage on BD (Post, Izaurralde, Mann, & Bliss, 2001) for SOC and TN stock calculation.…”
Section: Soil Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%