2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2018.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaker-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction of methylene blue using deep eutectic solvent followed by back-extraction and spectrophotometric determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shaker-assisted liquid−liquid microextraction using hydrophobic DESs was used to remove methylene blue from alkaline solutions (0.5 M NaOH). 34 It was back-extracted into a solution consisting of hydrochloric acid (2 M). The DES used throughout the investigation was decanoic acid with methyltrioctylammonium bromide in a 2:1 molar ratio.…”
Section: ■ Applications Of Hydrophobic Dessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shaker-assisted liquid−liquid microextraction using hydrophobic DESs was used to remove methylene blue from alkaline solutions (0.5 M NaOH). 34 It was back-extracted into a solution consisting of hydrochloric acid (2 M). The DES used throughout the investigation was decanoic acid with methyltrioctylammonium bromide in a 2:1 molar ratio.…”
Section: ■ Applications Of Hydrophobic Dessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For organic pollution, the treatment efficiencies that characterize a tertiary treatment are the accompanying: organic pollution reduction of essentially 95% for BOD, 85% for COD, the nitrogen reduction of essentially 70%, the phosphorus reduction of essentially 80% and the microbiological reduction accomplishing a waste coliform thickness of < 1000 of every 100 ml. Moreover, explicit industrial effluents might require extra treatment for explicit determinants that may not be normal in many wastewaters [18,19].…”
Section: Wastewater Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, about 82% of lands are polluted by the products of petroleum source (hydrocarbons, solvents etc.) used as an energy foundation in the oil industry, in addition, the chemicals were used in various industries and their wastewaters may be included the different pollutants such as, BTEX, VOCs, mercury, arsenic, nickel and vanadium which was determined by analytical methods [19]. There is a diversity of pollutants influencing water bodies, air, soil and subsoil, such as fuel and oil products, crude oil, hydrocarbon residues, other products resulting from the operation (unsaturated and saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons, and the polycyclic and monocyclic aromatic).…”
Section: Environment Pollution Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fruit juice GC-FID [314] Amphetamine and methamphetamine Human plasma, pharmaceutical waste water HPLC-UV [315] Synthetic pigments Tea beverages, carbonated drinks, fruit juices, lactobacillus beverages HPLC-PDA [316] Malondialdehyde and formaldehyde Human urine, apple juice, and rain water HPLC-UV [317] Nitroaromatic compounds Water HPLC-UV [318] Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Industrial effluents GC-MS [301] Caffeine Green tea, cola and energy drink HPLC-UV [319] Methylene blue Wastewater and river water UV-Vis [320] Pyrethroid pesticides Tea beverages and fruit juices HPLC-UV [321] GC-FID: gas chromatography with flame ionization detection; GC-MS: gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection; FL: fluorescence detector; FAAS: flame atomic absorption spectrometry; UV: ultraviolet; Vis: visible; HPLC-PDA: high performance liquid chromatography equipped with photodiode array detector.…”
Section: Pesticidesmentioning
confidence: 99%