“…The term points towardsamarvellously eclectic arrayo f walking -thinking-writing practices (Ingold and Vergunst 2008):d rawing upon influences as various as situationism, performance art, cultural geography,p sychogeography,n atural history,r hythmanalysis,p henomenology, flâ -neurie, social anthropology,autoethnography, urban sociology,a ctor-networkt heory,l andscape archaeology,activist interventions, nonrepresentational theories or landscape art/ sculpture.T his context has produced some beautiful,h aunting, thought-provoking work on geographies of walking;J ones 's( 2005, 2008) walkst hrough inter-tidal ecologiesa nd childhoods paces,L orimer and Lund's( 2008) mountain trails, Pinder's( 2005) urban explorations, Sidaway's( 2009) mapping of geopolitical and personal 'shadows on the path' andW ylie's( 2009)r eflections upon landscapea nd love are notableg eographical examples close to our hearts. Although diverse in their foci,t hese examples share ac ommitment to thinking through the practice of walking itself.I ndeed, we would argue that a key achievement of new walking studies has been to highlight four characteristics of walking practices.…”