1995
DOI: 10.1080/00275514.1995.12026602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexuality and somatic incompatibility inPhellinus gilvus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fr. (Rizzo et al 1995b). In the latter cases, only one cycle of inbreeding among sib‐related spores could give rise to VCGs with nonclonal mycelia, and vegetative compatibility would therefore be incapable of distinguishing such genetically distinct individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fr. (Rizzo et al 1995b). In the latter cases, only one cycle of inbreeding among sib‐related spores could give rise to VCGs with nonclonal mycelia, and vegetative compatibility would therefore be incapable of distinguishing such genetically distinct individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several of the multinucleate species have clamp connections in the heterokaryotic phase, e.g., Heterobasidion annosum, many multinucleate species lack clamp connections altogether or have clamp connections in both homokaryotic and heterokaryotic phases (10), making it difficult to distinguish homokaryons from heterokaryons. The mating systems of multinucleate fungi have been investigated using visual scoring of mycelial interactions or by pairing putative heterokaryons with the original homokaryotic isolates and scoring incompatibility reactions versus intermingling (50,71,79). Because the genetic basis for incompatibility is unknown in these studies, approaches directly examining genotypes rather than phenotypes would be advantageous because isolates may be somatically compatible but not mating compatible (9, 70).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to a limited number of loci and alleles coding for the vegetative incompatibility (Hansen, Stenlid & Johansson, 1993 ;Rizzo, Rentmeester & Burdsall, 1995), fungal VCGs do not necessarily represent clones, and in this case DNA fingerprinting can confirm whether VCGs correspond to clonal lineages (Anderson & Kohn, 1995). Although in wood destroying basidiomycetes that tend to form territorial clones, such as Phellinus weirii and Armillaria spp., DNA markers are not always consistent with the assignment of isolates to VCGs, the discrepancies are regarded as minor, since DNA patterns exhibited by the majority of compatible isolates are identical or nearly so (Bae, Hansen & Strauss, 1994 ;Guillaumin et al, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%