Sexual Quality of Life in Homosexual and Bisexual Men: The Relative Role of Minority Stress

Abstract

Background Minority stress is an important risk factor for sexual problems in gay and bisexual men. It remains unclear whether and to what extent this stress is associated with the sexual quality of life in these groups. Aim To investigate the significance of minority stress as a factor explaining the sexual quality of life in gay and bisexual men. Methods The analysis is based on data collected in an Internet study on the sexuality of Polish gay, bisexual, and straight men. Multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the importance of minority stress in explaining the sexual quality of life in a group of 1,486 non-heterosexual men in the context of other predictors, including demographics, the level of current sexual function, sexual patterns and experiences, and mental and physical health. We used the Sexual Minority Stress Scale based on Ilan Meyer’s Minority Stress Model, with its subscales relating to internalized homophobia, expectation of rejection, concealment, and sexual minority negative events. The level of sexual functioning was evaluated using 2 scales, the International Index of Erectile Functioning and the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool. Data on the remaining predictors were obtained using a survey that we developed. Main Outcome Measures The men’s sexual quality of life as rated on the Sexual Quality of Life Scale for Men was a dependent variable. Results Internalized homophobia (β = −0.28; P < .001) and sexual minority negative events (β = −0.09; P < .001) were statistically significant predictors of sexual quality of life in non-heterosexual men. Internalized homophobia (β = −0.28; P < .001) and erectile function (β = 0.29, P < .001) turned out to be the strongest predictors. Sexual orientation (gay vs bisexual) and its interactions with individual processes of minority stress were statistically nonsignificant. Clinical Implications To evaluate and improve the sexual quality of life of non-heterosexual men, it is necessary to consider not only their sexual function, but also the minority stress they experience, particularly internalized homophobia. Strengths & Limitations The major strengths of the study include a large sample size, a comprehensive assessment of minority stress, and the previously understudied Central European cultural context. The major limitations are the nonrepresentative sampling, retrospective data collection, and cross-sectional design. Conclusion Internalized homophobia predicts poorer sexual quality of life in gay and bisexual men in Poland.

The diverse joys of sex and relationships in straight, gay, and bisexual Polish men.

“…The present analysis drew on a database obtained from as part of a larger research project on the sexuality of Polish SM, GM and BM, whose methodology has been elaborately described in previous publications [13,14]. This was an online cross-sectional study involving 3,697 men.…”

Is sexual identity associated with the risk of premature ejaculation?

“…W interpretacji możliwych różnic obejmujących różne aspekty funkcjonowania seksualnego między mężczyznami heteroseksualnymi (MH) i MG lub MB wskazywano na znaczenie czynników związanych z samą seksualnością (stosunku pochwowego i analnego, rozpowszechnienia kontaktów oralnych, odwracalności ról seksualnych, równoczesnego orgazmu, lęku przed niechcianą ciążą, liczby partnerów seksualnych, nasilenia lęku zadaniowego, form związków seksualnych i romantycznych) [20,21,23], ze stresem mniejszościowym (unikatowym i dodatkowym obciążeniem dotykającym mężczyzn z grup mniejszościowych) [24,25] i zdrowiem (gorsze wskaźniki zdrowia somatycznego, psychicznego i seksualnego łączące się ze stresem mniejszościowym) [26,27].…”

Quality of life and prosocial or antisocial coping with resource deprivation: A cross-sectional study of people at risk of social exclusion

“…People at risk of social exclusion experience a low quality of life in a particular way [30][31][32][33][34]. Marginalization consists in excluding an individual from the community, either physically or emotionally, through interpersonal rejection, ostracism, or various types of discrimination.…”