2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3874368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Orientation and Earnings. A Meta-Analysis 2012-2020

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider income, overtime, and promotion prospects as common job characteristics that influence individual job decisions. Recent research shows differences in these outcomes by sexual orientation and gender identity [ 11 , 25 ]. We additionally use an LGBTQ*-friendly work climate and diversity management to measure two dimensions of nondiscriminatory working environments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We consider income, overtime, and promotion prospects as common job characteristics that influence individual job decisions. Recent research shows differences in these outcomes by sexual orientation and gender identity [ 11 , 25 ]. We additionally use an LGBTQ*-friendly work climate and diversity management to measure two dimensions of nondiscriminatory working environments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1990s, income inequality based on sexual orientation has been examined in numerous studies and recent research has found that gay men earn less than heterosexual men, whereas there are mixed results for lesbian women compared to heterosexual women [ 25 ]. Other studies have shown that bisexual women and men tend to earn less than heterosexual individuals of the same gender [ 25 ]. Some of the first studies focusing on the income of transgender people found that they have a lower (household) income than cisgender individuals [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the extent that there are earnings differentials among workers based on the sexual orientation of those workers, a possible explanation is invidious employment discrimination. That question has been of interest in academia as well as among policymakers concerned with the measurable manifestations of cultural attitudes (Bailey et al, 2013;Brewer and Lyons, 2016;Drydakis, 2020;Sandfort et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%