1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01938.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual isolation between two newt species, Triturus vulgaris and T. montandoni (Amphibia, Urodela, Salamandridae)

Abstract: Riolqpical~r/ournal ofthe Linnenn Socie!v (1 999), 67: 343 352.Article ID: bijl. 1998.0306, available online at http://~w.idealibra r)...com o n I D E b b 0 c Sexual isolation between two newt species, -Triturus vulgaris and T montandoni (Amphibia, Urodela, Salamandridae)In the present study we investigated sexual isolation between TrituruJ vulgaris and 7: montandoni in mating experiments run under semi-natural conditions. The two newt species offer a suitable model for studying evolution of reproductive isola… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such hierarchical sampling should allow us to disentangle systematic differences between zones from random variation between transects (Janoušek et al, ). Overall, all transects were similar—allele frequency clines were narrow compared to the dispersal capabilities of newts (Smith & Green, ) and hybrids were uncommon, indicating strong reproductive isolation, due to assortative mating (Babik, Szymura, & Rafiński, ; Michalak & Rafiński, ) and possibly low fitness of hybrids. Local variation in environmental factors had some modulating effect on the characteristics of individual transects, but environmental associations were relatively weak compared to spatial position within the transect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Such hierarchical sampling should allow us to disentangle systematic differences between zones from random variation between transects (Janoušek et al, ). Overall, all transects were similar—allele frequency clines were narrow compared to the dispersal capabilities of newts (Smith & Green, ) and hybrids were uncommon, indicating strong reproductive isolation, due to assortative mating (Babik, Szymura, & Rafiński, ; Michalak & Rafiński, ) and possibly low fitness of hybrids. Local variation in environmental factors had some modulating effect on the characteristics of individual transects, but environmental associations were relatively weak compared to spatial position within the transect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies on mating behaviour in T. vulgaris and T. montandoni (Michalak et al . 1997) in laboratory and garden pond experiments (Michalak & Rafiński 1999) showed strong behavioural isolation between newts from allopatric populations. Some asymmetry in isolation was also detected, with the montandoni females being more discriminating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In heterospecific matings T. montandoni females appear to be more discriminating than T. vulgaris females (Michalak et al . 1997; Michalak & Rafiński 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrids of intermediate phenotype were recorded in Ukraine by Hofmann (1908), Kushniruk (1963) and Bannikov (1969), in Romania by Fuhn (1963) and Fuhn et al (1975), in Poland by SzeligaMierzeyewski & Ulasiewicz (1931), Juszczyk &Świerad (1984, Rafiński (1985Rafiński ( , 1988, Pecio & Rafiński (1985), Rafiński & Pecio (1989) and Babik et al (2003), and in the Czech Republic described by Rehák (1992Rehák ( , 1993, Zwach (1992), Šálek (1993), Kotlík et al (1997), Kotlík & Zavadil (1999) and Zavadil et al (2003Zavadil et al ( , 2004. Besides hybrids in nature, hybrids in captivity were obtained during laboratory experimental crosses (Wolterstorff 1925;Geyer 1953Geyer , 1954Macgregor et al 1990;Cogȃlniceanu 1992Cogȃlniceanu , 1994Michalak & Rafiński 1999). A detailed survey of T. vulgaris and T. montandoni hybrid zone in Poland exhibits its mosaic pattern, i.e., genetic composition of populations is only weakly associated with their geographic position (Babik et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%