2013
DOI: 10.1159/000353260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Dimorphism in the Brain of the Monogamous California Mouse (Peromyscus californicus)

Abstract: Sex differences in behavior and morphology are usually assumed to be stronger in polygynous species compared to monogamous species. A few brain structures have been identified as sexually dimorphic in polygynous rodent species, but it is less clear whether these differences persist in monogamous species. California mice are among the 5% or less of mammals that are considered to be monogamous and as such provide an ideal model to examine sexual dimorphism in neuroanatomy. In the present study we compared the vo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to considering short term and long term effects of KOR signaling, it will be important to examine the behavioral effects of KOR agonists in females of different rodent species. Male and female California mice exhibit sex differences in brain anatomy (Campi et al, 2013), immune responses (Klein and Nelson, 1997), and aggressive behavior (Trainor et al, 2011) that are similar to domestic rats and mice. However sex differences in body size (Williams et al, 2013), parental behavior (Bester-Meredith and Marler, 2003) and glucocorticoid levels (Harris et al, 2012) that are commonly observed in domestic rodents are less pronounced or absent in California mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to considering short term and long term effects of KOR signaling, it will be important to examine the behavioral effects of KOR agonists in females of different rodent species. Male and female California mice exhibit sex differences in brain anatomy (Campi et al, 2013), immune responses (Klein and Nelson, 1997), and aggressive behavior (Trainor et al, 2011) that are similar to domestic rats and mice. However sex differences in body size (Williams et al, 2013), parental behavior (Bester-Meredith and Marler, 2003) and glucocorticoid levels (Harris et al, 2012) that are commonly observed in domestic rodents are less pronounced or absent in California mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images of the left and right side of each brain area were imaged with a Zeiss AxioImager based on a mouse brain atlas and previous descriptions of the California mouse NAc and BNST (Campi et al, 2013). The background for each image was normalized by adjusting the exposure time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may seem incongruous that we failed to find many sex differences when so many behaviors in RGS are sexually dimorphic (Michener, 1998), but sex differences in brain region sizes, and the magnitude of those differences, are not always consistent across species or studies (Hines et al, 1992;Noonan et al, 1998;Galea and McEwen, 1999;Franklin et al, 2000;Spring et al, 2007;Iaskin, 2011;Kingsbury et al, 2012;Campi et al, 2013;Sawada et al, 2013). Indeed, there are several examples of brain regions that are sexually dimorphic in size in one study and not in another.…”
Section: Sex Differencesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Examples of this include the song system of songbirds (MacDougall-Shackleton and Ball, 1999;Tramontin and Brenowitz, 2000;Ball et al, 2008) and, in mammals, the hippocampus (Yaskin, 1994;Iaskin, 2011), prefrontal cortex (Kingsbury et al, 2012), medial amygdala (Hines et al, 1992), white matter tracts (Noonan et al, 1998;Franklin et al, 2000) and various other limbic and hypothalamic structures (Spring et al, 2007;Campi et al, 2013;Sawada et al, 2013). Functionally, sexually dimorphic volumes of brain regions are associated with sex differences in behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation