2017
DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual dimorphism, bite force and diet in the diamondback terrapin

Abstract: Sexual dimorphism in head size and shape has been documented in many animals and is often thought to be related to the consumption of different prey in males and females thus reducing competition between the two sexes. However, for this to be true, the difference in head size and shape should be associated with a difference in performance allowing one sex to exploit different prey resources. In many durophagous turtle species, females are bigger than males and have bigger heads for a given size. Here, we test … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…McLellan [68] addressed evolutionary explanations for sex differences in size, but our study suggests a different explanation might be necessary. It has recently been demonstrated that convergence in habitat specialists is not restricted to limb size and shape, but also occurs in other aspects of morphology, such as sexual size dimorphism and head shape [73]. Although functional demands imposed by prey traits, such as hardness and elusiveness may select for certain head shapes [28,33] in different sexes and age classes, it remains to be studied which aspects of the trophic niche may select for convergence in head shape in different ecomorphs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McLellan [68] addressed evolutionary explanations for sex differences in size, but our study suggests a different explanation might be necessary. It has recently been demonstrated that convergence in habitat specialists is not restricted to limb size and shape, but also occurs in other aspects of morphology, such as sexual size dimorphism and head shape [73]. Although functional demands imposed by prey traits, such as hardness and elusiveness may select for certain head shapes [28,33] in different sexes and age classes, it remains to be studied which aspects of the trophic niche may select for convergence in head shape in different ecomorphs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A long screw with a flattened free end (surface area of 3 mm 2 ) was mounted on the force transducer, and pushed onto the crab exoskeleton until mechanical failure of its external surface occurred and the maximal force was recorded. We compared data for Geograpsus grayi to previously collected data for other crustaceans 83 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationships between skull morphology, bite force, and diet have been investigated in a variety of animal groups, including fish [29,30], lizards [24,31], crocodilians [32], turtles [33], rodents [12,34], birds [23]. Many studies have also focused on bats [19][20][21][35][36][37][38][39][40], but studies involving skull morphology, in vivo bite force, and diets in a single study are limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%