1979
DOI: 10.1525/sp.1979.26.5.03a00060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Stratification, Technology and Organizational Change: A Longitudinal Case Study of AT&T

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Socialist-feminism also sheds light on the relationships among notions of comparable worth, the feminization of poverty, and race/ethnicity (Brenner 1991). The sex discrimination suit won against AT&T relied heavily on Hacker's (1979) groundbreaking analysis of the gender and racial dimensions of managerial practices. It is the care with which socialist-feminists underscore the intersections of class, gender, and racial/ ethnic domination that results in powerful-yet nuanced-interpretations of the organization of contemporary institutions and practical struggles to change them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socialist-feminism also sheds light on the relationships among notions of comparable worth, the feminization of poverty, and race/ethnicity (Brenner 1991). The sex discrimination suit won against AT&T relied heavily on Hacker's (1979) groundbreaking analysis of the gender and racial dimensions of managerial practices. It is the care with which socialist-feminists underscore the intersections of class, gender, and racial/ ethnic domination that results in powerful-yet nuanced-interpretations of the organization of contemporary institutions and practical struggles to change them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender differences persist when education, age, seniority, and other relevant characteristics of an employee's current job are statistically controlled. These findings suggest that gender is among the variables that condition how an innovation is perceived, that the gender-specific consequences found in studies of completed innovations (e.g., Cockburn, 1981;Hacker, 1979) may have been anticipated by jobholders, that technological change may exacerbate gender differences in the workplace (operating in part through differential expectations and their effects on receptivity to change), and that efforts to introduce new technology into the workplace should begin by assessing employees' expectations and seeking systematic differences in expectations between categories of workers. THE …”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…(See National Research Council 1987 for a recent discussion of these issues. See also Donoto and Roos 1985; Feldberg and Glenn 1983; Gutek and Bikson 1985;Hacker 1982;Kraft 1987; Kraft and Dubnoff 1986;Lockheed 1985; Marschall and Gregory 1983;Menzies 1981;Simons 1981;Strober and Arbold 1984;Werneke 1983; Working Women's Education Fund 1980.) Studies of earlier &dquo;new technologies&dquo; have shown that since majorities of men and women work in different occupations, and since new technologies affect workers in various occupations quite differently, the same technological change can have widely disparate consequences for women and men.…”
Section: Social Science Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro-level effects on particular workplaces or occupations are quite different from macrolevel effects. Only studies of the latter take into account the so-called compensating effects of job gains in other firms, localities, or occupations than the ones originally affected by job loss (Hacker 1982;Cawkell 1986).…”
Section: Employmentmentioning
confidence: 99%