2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.07.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-specific walking kinematics and kinetics in individuals with unilateral, symptomatic hip osteoarthritis: A cross sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from a single study where no differences were found in any gait kinematic variable between OA and healthy patients in either men or women [ 43 ], all other studies showed gender differences. Men walked with a greater forward trunk lean and had greater peak hip external rotation moment than women [ 44 ]. However, women had a greater external hip adduction moment throughout stance than men [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from a single study where no differences were found in any gait kinematic variable between OA and healthy patients in either men or women [ 43 ], all other studies showed gender differences. Men walked with a greater forward trunk lean and had greater peak hip external rotation moment than women [ 44 ]. However, women had a greater external hip adduction moment throughout stance than men [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of applications were presented throughout this paper. Additional interest has been noted in osteoarthritis [ 88 , 89 ], patellofemoral pain [ 90 ], military training [ 91 , 92 ], shoe design [ 93 ], and multiple sclerosis [ 94 ], to name just a few.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the low number of cases, we were not able to take gender into account in our study, as was done by Than et al [34], who found differences between the sexes in terms of leg alignment. Furthermore, Foucher et al [50] and Allison et al [48] were able to report higher hip adduction moments in women compared to men with hip OA. The hip and knee adduction moments are still the gold standards for assessing the load in the frontal plane; however, the joint contact force, calculated using musculoskeletal modeling, is likely a better indicator of joint load compared to joint moments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A gait compensation pattern of a stable or elevated pelvis, in combination with an increased trunk lean toward the involved side, was shown by Thurston [46] in individuals with hip OA and by Westhoff et al [47] in children with Legg Calvé Perthes disease as a compensating strategy to reduce the hip load. However, an increased contralateral trunk lean associated with an increased pelvic drop was also shown in individuals with hip OA [46,48]; hence, the presence of these different combined movements may have confounded the correlation between the single movements and the external hip joint moments. Furthermore, Linley et al [49] found that only a thorough biomechanical analysis using a principal component analysis could reveal differences in the trunk and pelvic leans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%