1996
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(96)00177-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex selection in mammals: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sperm preselection on the basis of preferred sex before conception has been proposed to avoid the tragic or deadly sex-linked hereditary disorders in humans, to conserve endangered species and to mass produce single-sexed laboratory animals (Jafar and Flint 1996;Reubinoff and Schenker 1996;Howes et al 1997;Hendriksen 1999;Seidel and Johnson 1999). Previous studies have focused mainly on the physical and chemical distinguishing characteristics of sperm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sperm preselection on the basis of preferred sex before conception has been proposed to avoid the tragic or deadly sex-linked hereditary disorders in humans, to conserve endangered species and to mass produce single-sexed laboratory animals (Jafar and Flint 1996;Reubinoff and Schenker 1996;Howes et al 1997;Hendriksen 1999;Seidel and Johnson 1999). Previous studies have focused mainly on the physical and chemical distinguishing characteristics of sperm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current strategies include detecting the H-Y antigen cytogenetically, measuring X-linked enzymes and localising Y chromosomespecific DNA sequences (Krco and Goldberg 1976;Jafar and Flint 1996;Reubinoff and Schenker 1996;Howes et al 1997;Blecher et al 1999;Hendriksen 1999;Seidel and Johnson 1999;Johnson 2000;Gardon et al 2004). Unfortunately, these technologies have not been applied consistently to identify sexed sperm in laboratory animals, other large domestic animal species or humans (Grabske et al 1975;Vidal et al 1993;Risopatron et al 1996;Johnson and Welch 1999a;Kim et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex ratio was observed no difference between in vivo and in vitro embryo in Table 2. In general, the male to female sex ratio in cattle embryos approaches 1:1, with 2~3% more male than females (Jafar and Flint, 1996). Several authors report that IVP bovine embryos deviate from 1.3:1 to 1.9:1 from the normal 1:1 ratio on day 7 (Carvalho et al, 1996), However, in two other studies, the sex ration of bovine IVP embryos was approximately 1:1 (Grisart et al, 1995), and Bredbacka and Brebacka (1996) and Yadav et al (1993) reported that, the rates of male defined embryo were significantly (p<0.05) higher than female defined embryos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that embryo sexing produces accuracy rates of 92%, 94%, and >96% with, respectively, the use of 1 blastomere, 2 blastomeres, and 3 blastomeres which are biopsied from an embryo (6)(7)(8). In previous research the accuracy of embryo sexing with nonelectrophoretic PCR and electrophoretic PCR was determined at 93% and 89%, respectively (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%