2018
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex, plasticity, and biologically significant variation in one Glomeromycotina species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is, therefore, highly relevant to understand the molecular interactions that occur between closely related but genetically different coexisting R. irregularis genotypes within plant roots. Such interactions could potentially range from the transcription of genes that allow recognition between pairs of fungal genotypes to more direct interactions leading to sexual reproduction; a process that probably remains highly elusive to researchers because it may be very rare [7]. To date, we are not aware of any studies that have looked at such molecular interactions between AMF genotypes in planta.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is, therefore, highly relevant to understand the molecular interactions that occur between closely related but genetically different coexisting R. irregularis genotypes within plant roots. Such interactions could potentially range from the transcription of genes that allow recognition between pairs of fungal genotypes to more direct interactions leading to sexual reproduction; a process that probably remains highly elusive to researchers because it may be very rare [7]. To date, we are not aware of any studies that have looked at such molecular interactions between AMF genotypes in planta.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the notion of complete asexuality in these taxa is unlikely because: (1) a full repertoire of genes required for meiosis is present in the genome of the model AM fungus R. irregularis [ 17 , 18 ]; (2) a putative MAT-locus has been proposed and identified in different Glomerales and Diversiporales species [ 19 ]; (3) population genetic data suggest the existence of recombination in AM fungus populations [ 20 ]; (4) some internucleus recombination has been reported [ 21 ], although the existence of adequate evidence to support this has recently been questioned [ 22 ]. Sexual reproduction in AMF may, indeed, occur frequently enough to purge deleterious mutations, but may not be frequent enough to be readily observable in experiments, making its experimental observation highly elusive [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our result illustrates, for the specific case of genomic diversity in an individual, how life history and ecology can select for “generalist” phenotypes (Hedrick, Ginevan, & Ewing, ; Levins, ; Levins & MacArthur, ). Furthermore, our model implies that genomic diversity might be favored in some, but not all environments (Sanders, ). Discrepancies between different empirical estimates of genomic diversity in natural AM fungi populations might reflect environmental differences in either: (a) the density of plants (which may affect the returns on nucleus specialization); or (b) the mixture of different plant types.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of genomic diversity in AM fungi is a matter of considerable debate, which is beyond the scope of our paper (Lin et al, ; Maeda et al, ; Ropars & Corradi, ; Tisserant et al, ; Wyss et al, ). Our aim is to examine how, if diversity exists, it could plausibly be maintained (Bruns, Corradi, Redecker, Taylor, & Öpik, ; Sanders, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, after a slight demotion, AM fungi appear somewhat more traditional than originally thought. Regardless, many aspects of their biology are still a mystery including extensive variation in their ability to promote plant growth, as pointed out in a Letter from Sanders (; in this issue of New Phytologist , pp. 968–970).…”
Section: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosismentioning
confidence: 99%