2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-019-00855-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex estimation from the calcaneus and talus using discriminant function analysis and its possible application in fossil remains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of certain characteristics, age assessment was therefore primarily based on skeletal maturity and the degenerative changes observed in the vertebral bodies and joint ends. Inferences about sex were drawn from a number of metric determinations that could be collected from the humeral head and calcaneus 65 – 67 . For comparison of the vertical diameter of the caput humeri, regional data from adult skeletal Únětice Culture burials can be used (mean value for male individuals (n = 21): 44.4 mm; mean value for female individuals (n = 23): 40.95 mm) 17 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of certain characteristics, age assessment was therefore primarily based on skeletal maturity and the degenerative changes observed in the vertebral bodies and joint ends. Inferences about sex were drawn from a number of metric determinations that could be collected from the humeral head and calcaneus 65 – 67 . For comparison of the vertical diameter of the caput humeri, regional data from adult skeletal Únětice Culture burials can be used (mean value for male individuals (n = 21): 44.4 mm; mean value for female individuals (n = 23): 40.95 mm) 17 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex determination was carried out using four discriminant functions (Supplementary Table S2) (Gualdi-Russo, 2007;Zakaria et al, 2010;Spradley and Jantz, 2011;Alonso-Llamazares and Pablos, 2019), which are based on linear measurements of the calcaneus (Table 2). The final sex determination for each individual was based on the most frequent sex estimated per individual.…”
Section: Sex Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences enabled the development of discriminant functions to estimate the sex based on calcaneal measures. The correct estimation rates achieved based on these equations varied between 64% and 95.7% (Steele, 1976;Riepert et al, 1996;Bidmos and Asala, 2003;Bidmos and Asala, 2004;Gualdi-Russo, 2007;DiMichele and Spradley, 2012;Kim et al, 2013;Alonso-Llamazares and Pablos, 2019). Nevertheless, the criteria for sex estimation based on calcaneal morphology is population-specific and should be carried out with caution (Gualdi-Russo, 2007;Alonso-Llamazares and Pablos, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study also seeks to apply the Alonso-Llamazares and Pablos (2019) formulae generated from the HTHOC to the BSTAL cemetery populations to evaluate their accuracy for these populations. If successful, the Alonso-Llamazares and Pablos (2019) formulae could be used with con dence on similar populations where the sex of the individual is unknown, or when other sexually dimorphic skeletal material is absent or indeterminate (Klales 2013).…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%