2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00241-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differential item functioning in the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices: evidence for bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
42
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
42
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the use of a unidimensional Rasch model leads to only very limited bias. There are also indications that the Standard Raven is biased across gender (Abad, Colom, Rebollo, & Escorial, 2004;Mackintosh & Bennett, 2005) and that there are sex by age interactions (Lynn et al, 2004). Despite these indications of suboptimal fit of the Rasch model, imperfect scaling is to be preferred over no scaling at all.…”
Section: Zygosity Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the use of a unidimensional Rasch model leads to only very limited bias. There are also indications that the Standard Raven is biased across gender (Abad, Colom, Rebollo, & Escorial, 2004;Mackintosh & Bennett, 2005) and that there are sex by age interactions (Lynn et al, 2004). Despite these indications of suboptimal fit of the Rasch model, imperfect scaling is to be preferred over no scaling at all.…”
Section: Zygosity Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional analyses have examined mean and variance differences in scores on tests of general and specific abilities (Feingold, 1995). More sophisticated statistical analyses have addressed sex differences in factor structures, g-loadings, and differential functioning of test items that might explain the observed mean differences (Abad, Colom, Rebollo, & Escorial, 2004;Halpern, 2000;Jensen, 1998). Laboratory-based studies have made use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and other techniques to investigate differences in sizes of structural brain components and physiological and neurological activity levels in various brain regions (Gur, Gunning-Dixon, Bilker, & Gur;Kimura, 1999;Sommer, Aleman, Bouma, & Kahn, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is not entirely true that transfer is only observed in the visuo-spatial domain for all kinds of trained tasks (Carretti et al, 2013;Loosli et al, 2012;von Bastian & Oberauer, 2013) it is pertinent to speculate that the effectiveness of WM training registered in some studies could be narrowly connected to the inclusion of visual-spatial tasks, mostly when matrix reasoning tests are used as transfer tasks (Stephenson & Halpern, 2013). For instance, cognitive instrument items, such as SPM and BOMAT and the WM tasks (employed in these studies), are of a visual-spatial nature (Abad, Colom, Rebollo, & Escorial, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the other hand, other authors identifi ed that the practice distribution during the sessions could be more important than the duration of training, per se. Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, and Wixted (2006) speculate that it is important to leave suffi cient time to consolidate the skills the participants acquired with a fi xed interval between sessions, and at the same time, remain suffi ciently condensed in order to minimize the risk that the participants will lose the benefi cial effects of having practiced the task. Morrison and Chein (2011) propose alternative interpretations for the few intellectual gains found in reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%