The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in visual attention toward infant faces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
70
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
70
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 95% of mammals, females are essentially responsible for rearing the offspring [57]. Cárdenas and colleagues [42] found that women took longer time and looked more often at unknown infant faces, than at unknown adults. The authors explained this as an adaptation of human cognition to infant care as a result of alloparental care in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 95% of mammals, females are essentially responsible for rearing the offspring [57]. Cárdenas and colleagues [42] found that women took longer time and looked more often at unknown infant faces, than at unknown adults. The authors explained this as an adaptation of human cognition to infant care as a result of alloparental care in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alloparental investment is common in humans, because human infants are very costly to raise. The assistance of alloparents could thus act as a benefit for reproductive success [42]. In this case, the stimulus baby schema should not only lead to a positive emotional reaction, but may also provoke prioritized attention as stimuli with high biological relevance are assumed to be processed preferably by the attentional system [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has led to the assumption that women might be better tuned than men to reading emotional expressions in infants (Babchuk et al, 1985; Cárdenas et al, 2013; Hahn et al, 2013). However, while behavioral studies sometimes find gender differences (Cárdenas et al, 2013; Hahn et al, 2013), others do not (Brosch et al, 2007; Parsons et al, 2011; Borgi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Study 2: Infant Emotion Recognition By Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been shown when infant faces were provided as viewing options along with same-sex and opposite-sex adult faces ; but see Parsons, Young, Kumari, Stein, & Kringelbach, 2011) as well as when animal faces were used as additional viewing options (Charles, Alexander, & Saenz, 2013). Similarly, infant faces have been shown to capture women's attention to a greater extent that same-sex or opposite-sex faces, whereas infant faces capture men's attention more so than same-sex faces, but much less than opposite-sex faces (Cárdenas, Harris, & Becker, 2013; but see Brosch et al, 2007).…”
Section: Sexually Dimorphic Responses To Infantsmentioning
confidence: 99%