2013
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1316909110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain

Abstract: Sex differences in human behavior show adaptive complementarity: Males have better motor and spatial abilities, whereas females have superior memory and social cognition skills. Studies also show sex differences in human brains but do not explain this complementarity. In this work, we modeled the structural connectome using diffusion tensor imaging in a sample of 949 youths (aged 8-22 y, 428 males and 521 females) and discovered unique sex differences in brain connectivity during the course of development. Con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

54
621
12
24

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,000 publications
(747 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(57 reference statements)
54
621
12
24
Order By: Relevance
“…This is one of many similar methods commonly used in genetics studies to approximate permutation testing (Sham & Purcell, 2014). Permutation testing has been used previously in connectomics (Ingalhalikar et al., 2014), but remains a computationally expensive method of multiple testing correction. Another option is to reduce the number of tests by using measures such as the network‐based statistic (Zalesky, Fornito, & Bullmore, 2010), or to consider graph theoretical measures that produce node‐ or graph‐level values (Kaiser, 2011; Rubinov & Sporns, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is one of many similar methods commonly used in genetics studies to approximate permutation testing (Sham & Purcell, 2014). Permutation testing has been used previously in connectomics (Ingalhalikar et al., 2014), but remains a computationally expensive method of multiple testing correction. Another option is to reduce the number of tests by using measures such as the network‐based statistic (Zalesky, Fornito, & Bullmore, 2010), or to consider graph theoretical measures that produce node‐ or graph‐level values (Kaiser, 2011; Rubinov & Sporns, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En el presente estudio se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre hombres y mujeres en las funciones dorsolaterales y en el desempeño total de la batería BANFE, observándose un mejor desempeño en los hombres; resultado que podría explicarse por la mayor especialización funcional hemisférica que presentan los hombres, la cual favorece una mayor conectividad entre la percepción y la acción coordinada, mientras que las mujeres tienen mayor procesamiento interhemisférico, el cual facilita la comunicación entre los modos de procesamiento analítico e intuitivo (Ingalhalikar et al, 2014). Sin embargo, hay algunos autores que afirman que el mayor grosor del cuerpo calloso se correlaciona con un mejor rendimiento cognitivo en las mujeres (Davatzikos & Resnick, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The Guardian or El País) published news about an article that came out in the PNAS (Ingalhalikar et al 2014), which according to one of the authors of the study, Ragini Verma, supported old stereotypes, "with men's brains wired more for perception and coordinated actions", and "women's for social skills and memory, making them better equipped for multitasking". Soon after, Cordelia Fine (2013) responded that the research provided no evidence that those modest behavioral sex differences are associated with brain connectivity differences, and it offered no information about the developmental origins of either behavioral or brain differences.…”
Section: Stereotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%