2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences in the Long-term Prognosis of Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
43
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the most recent discoveries of Cannata et al with regard to a lower mortality rate in women, in our own analysis, gender was not found to be related to the outcome in multivariate prognostic analyses, a finding which is in accordance with the BCN Bio-HF and SHFM studies. [33][34][35] Intriguingly, EF was not found to be a significant independent prognostic factor, which is in line with the BCN Bio-HF study, but not with the latest prognostic analysis in HF, that is, PARADIGM-HF (Simpson et al reported a 7% decrease in mortality rate for every 5% increase of EF). 36 Similarly, BB usage was not a crucial factor (probably due to the high rate of use of this treatment in both survivors and non-survivors).…”
Section: The Development Of a Mortality Calculator Tailored For Dilatsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In contrast to the most recent discoveries of Cannata et al with regard to a lower mortality rate in women, in our own analysis, gender was not found to be related to the outcome in multivariate prognostic analyses, a finding which is in accordance with the BCN Bio-HF and SHFM studies. [33][34][35] Intriguingly, EF was not found to be a significant independent prognostic factor, which is in line with the BCN Bio-HF study, but not with the latest prognostic analysis in HF, that is, PARADIGM-HF (Simpson et al reported a 7% decrease in mortality rate for every 5% increase of EF). 36 Similarly, BB usage was not a crucial factor (probably due to the high rate of use of this treatment in both survivors and non-survivors).…”
Section: The Development Of a Mortality Calculator Tailored For Dilatsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…However, much of our knowledge on cardiac disease is still based on studies done in males, and even today much experimental work in animal studies neglects females. The prevalence of dilated cardiomyopathy is higher in men, with both historic and current studies showing a ratio of 25-30% of women, compared with 70-75% men [3,[74][75][76][77]. Women are older at diagnosis by 1-3 years compared with men, and are more likely to present with heart failure and left bundle branch block [74][75][76].…”
Section: Sex and Gender Differences In Rbm20 Cardiomyopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to underline that the activation of the estrogen receptors, mostly found in women, by 17β-estradiol prevents the apoptosis of cardiomyocyte, inhibits cardiac damage induced by reactive oxygen species, and reduces cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis [42]. In a recent work by Cannatà et al, female sex resulted, in a large population of DCM patients (n = 1113 of total prospectively enrolled patients; n = 586 selected for analysis), as an independent favorable predictor for long-term cardiovascular outcomes (including cardiovascular mortality/need for heart transplantation or ventricular assist device) [43].…”
Section: Sex-related Differences In Mechanisms Of Dcmmentioning
confidence: 99%