2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-013-3359-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in the effect of wheel running on subsequent nicotine-seeking in a rat adolescent-onset self-administration model

Abstract: Rationale Wheel running attenuates nicotine-seeking in male adolescent rats; however it is not known if this effect extends to females. Objective To determine if wheel running during abstinence would differentially attenuate subsequent nicotine-seeking in male and female rats that had extended access to nicotine self-administration during adolescence. Methods Male (N = 49) and female (N = 43) adolescent rats self-administered saline or nicotine (5μg/kg) under an extended access (23-hour) paradigm. Followin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
60
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(82 reference statements)
10
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result substantiates our recent study of nicotine self-administration in Sprague-Dawley rats (Morganstern et al, 2013), and it is also consistent with other reports indicating that early exposure to a palatable, fat-rich diet increases ethanol drinking and enhances sensitivity to the locomotor-stimulating effects of another drug, amphetamine (Bocarsly et al, 2012; Cabanes et al, 2000). While somewhat lower than those described in certain studies (Bardo, Green, Crooks, & Dwoskin, 1999; Lynch, 2009; Sanchez, Moore, Brunzell, & Lynch, 2014), the levels of nicotine IV self-administration obtained in the present study are similar to those in other reports (Cohen, Koob, & George, 2012; Gilpin et al, 2014) as well as our previous publication (Morganstern et al, 2013). Our main new finding is that fat-exposed offspring exhibit increased responding to a mixture of nicotine and ethanol, an effect evident during the training period, the dose-response testing, and the progressive ratio testing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This result substantiates our recent study of nicotine self-administration in Sprague-Dawley rats (Morganstern et al, 2013), and it is also consistent with other reports indicating that early exposure to a palatable, fat-rich diet increases ethanol drinking and enhances sensitivity to the locomotor-stimulating effects of another drug, amphetamine (Bocarsly et al, 2012; Cabanes et al, 2000). While somewhat lower than those described in certain studies (Bardo, Green, Crooks, & Dwoskin, 1999; Lynch, 2009; Sanchez, Moore, Brunzell, & Lynch, 2014), the levels of nicotine IV self-administration obtained in the present study are similar to those in other reports (Cohen, Koob, & George, 2012; Gilpin et al, 2014) as well as our previous publication (Morganstern et al, 2013). Our main new finding is that fat-exposed offspring exhibit increased responding to a mixture of nicotine and ethanol, an effect evident during the training period, the dose-response testing, and the progressive ratio testing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The notion that the rewarding effects of nicotine are greater in females is also supported in previous studies that compared sex differences in nicotine reward during the adolescent period of development. For example, adolescent female rats acquired nicotine IVSA at lower doses [28] and display higher levels of nicotine intake under extended access conditions [29] as compared to males. Another series of studies revealed that female rats that initiated nicotine IVSA during adolescence display an escalation of nicotine intake into adulthood, but this effect was not observed in males [30-31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to short-access schedules, long-access (23 hr) self-administration sessions can achieve levels of nicotine found in human smokers (Sanchez et al, 2014). However, nicotine is not the only tobacco constituent involved in addiction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%