1990
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.104.1.88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in spatial ability and activity in two vole species (Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus).

Abstract: The hypothesis that sex differences in maze learning result from sex differences in activity was tested with wild-caught prairie (Microtus ochrogaster) and meadow (M. pennsylvanicus) voles. For 38 voles error production and activity were simultaneously measured in a series of 7 symmetrical mazes. Repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAS) examined species, sex, maze, and interaction effects for 3 dependent variables: errors, activity, and errors/activity. The pattern of significant effects was very differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
46
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(49 reference statements)
6
46
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have also argued that there is an inverse relationship between spatial ability and exploratory/ambulatory behavior (e.g., Beatty, 1979). Although several studies have reported that female rats that make more errors on maze tasks also display higher locomotor behavior in a novel environment than do male animals (e.g., Stewart, Skvarenina, & Pottier, 1975), others have obtained no such relationship (Gaulin, FitzGerald, & Wartell, 1990;Seymour et al, 1996). Our data do address this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Researchers have also argued that there is an inverse relationship between spatial ability and exploratory/ambulatory behavior (e.g., Beatty, 1979). Although several studies have reported that female rats that make more errors on maze tasks also display higher locomotor behavior in a novel environment than do male animals (e.g., Stewart, Skvarenina, & Pottier, 1975), others have obtained no such relationship (Gaulin, FitzGerald, & Wartell, 1990;Seymour et al, 1996). Our data do address this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…No direct test of this hypothesis exists for rats, but it can be rejected for voles, where the more error-prone sex is less, not more, active during maze testing (42). Thus, the available data on rats and voles suggest that particular mating systems foster sexually dimorphic ranging patterns, whereas other mating systems foster monomorphism in both naturalistic behavior and psychometric performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, in comparison with monogamous voles, promiscuous voles develop more rapidly in their overall brain growth (Gutierrez et al, 1989) and in the development of specific central systems, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Liu et al, 2001b). Female meadow voles are induced to undergo behavioral estrus more rapidly after exposure to a conspecific male (Taylor et al, 1992) and appear to perform better in navigational mazes (Gaulin et al, 1990) compared with female prairie voles. Monogamous and promiscuous voles also differ in their neuropeptide systems, such as vasopressin and oxytocin (Insel and Shapiro, 1992;Wang et al, 1997b), and such differences appear to underlie their ability to form and express pair bonding behavior (Insel and Hulihan, 1995;Liu et al, 2001a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%