2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences and correlations in a virtual Morris water task, a virtual radial arm maze, and mental rotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

32
228
8
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
32
228
8
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants with and without cognitive impairment differed significantly with respect to age [t(54) = 2.12, P < 0.05] and education [t(54) = 2.19, P < 0.05], and the result for sex differences approached significance [χ 2 (1) = 3.21, P = 0.073]. These variables have also been found to relate to spatial navigation ability in previous studies (30)(31)(32)(33) and therefore were controlled in the analyses. Total brain (model 1), right (model 2), and left (model 3) hippocampal volume measures were added sequentially.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Participants with and without cognitive impairment differed significantly with respect to age [t(54) = 2.12, P < 0.05] and education [t(54) = 2.19, P < 0.05], and the result for sex differences approached significance [χ 2 (1) = 3.21, P = 0.073]. These variables have also been found to relate to spatial navigation ability in previous studies (30)(31)(32)(33) and therefore were controlled in the analyses. Total brain (model 1), right (model 2), and left (model 3) hippocampal volume measures were added sequentially.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Naturally, researchers have attempted to compare the allocentric spatial relational memory abilities of men and women using these virtual paradigms. Consistent with studies testing mental rotation and wayfinding, these virtual reality studies have identified some gender differences, with men typically performing better than women on a variety of measures such as the latency to find goal locations or complete mazes [2,3,19,36,46], or the number of errors (i.e., wrong turns) made while solving the task [33]. Although it is clear that these studies of spatial abilities in virtual environments demonstrate that men and women perform differentially, what is not clear is (1) whether the measures used specifically assess spatial memory, and thus whether their results can be interpreted to conclude that men have a better memory for spatial locations than women, or (2) whether similar gender differences in allocentric spatial memory exist in real-world (as compared to virtual) environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Recently, researchers studying human spatial memory have taken advantage of the development of 3D graphics and computer technology to design tasks which take place in virtual environments, and which aim to emulate the design of these tasks used in animals [2,3,19,33,36,46,51]. Subjects explore these virtual environments by using a joystick to move (i.e., shift their first-person visual perspective) throughout the virtual environment that is displayed on a computer screen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Navigation in computer-generated tasks also produces gender differences. A male advantage in time taken to locate a hidden (invisible) goal in such tasks by US college students has been hypothesized to be the result of men and women using different navigational methods (Astur, Tropp, Sava, Constable, & Markus, 2004). Sandstrom et al (1998) found a similar pattern when men and GENDER-BASED NAVIGATION STEREOTYPE 5 women from a US university were trained in a virtual water maze to navigate to an invisible submerged platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%