1962
DOI: 10.2535/ofaj1936.38.5_309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Difference in the Shape of the Mastoid Process in Norma occipitalis and its Importance to the Sex Determination of the Human Skull

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…M, N and F type (M-male, N-neutral, F-female type). 8 It was also suggested that when skulls were placed on flat surface, the male skulls rest on the mastoid processes while female skulls on occipital condyles or other portions of the skull. 8 This observation indirectly indicates that males skulls have more mastoid length as compared to female skulls, that is why, male skulls rest on mastoid processes but not female skulls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M, N and F type (M-male, N-neutral, F-female type). 8 It was also suggested that when skulls were placed on flat surface, the male skulls rest on the mastoid processes while female skulls on occipital condyles or other portions of the skull. 8 This observation indirectly indicates that males skulls have more mastoid length as compared to female skulls, that is why, male skulls rest on mastoid processes but not female skulls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement-based work obviously accommodates variation in size and shape. There are also several classifications of selected anatomical structures, which feature categories ranked from gracile to robust, that are designed to help with the visual assessment of shape (Hoshi 1962;WEA 1980;Buikstra and Ubelaker 1994;Walker 2008).…”
Section: Approaches To Sex Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous previous studies have pointed out that the mastoid process is a useful cranial region for diagnosing sex (e.g. Hoshi, 1962;Krogman and Iscan, 1986;Demoulin, 1972;Ubelaker, 1989;Stewart, 1979;Workshop of European Anthropologists, 1980;Brothwell, 1981;Krogman and Iscan, 1986;Nakahashi and Nagai, 1986;Mays, 1998;White and Folkens, 2000;Nagaoka and Hirata, 2005;Rogers, 2005). Hoshi (1962) showed that the direction of the tip of the mastoid process is sexually dimorphic; that is, it tends to be vertical in the male and pointed inward in the female.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%