2015
DOI: 10.1590/0100-69912015005010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severity assessment of acute pancreatitis: applying Marshall scoring system

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the effectiveness of the Marshall scoring system to evaluate the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). Methods : We performed a prospective, observational study in 39 patients with AP evaluated by the Marshall scoring system and the Ranson criteria (admission and 48 hours). We assessed the progression of the disease for seven days and compared the data of the two criteria. Results : Seven patients died during the observation period and one died afterwards. All deaths had shown failure o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with MAP did not experience these complications. BISAP, modified Balthazar CT, Ranson, APACHE II and Marshall scores6 were calculated at baseline according to our clinical practice. The HCT, WCC, neutrophil count (NC), lymphocyte count (LC), LR and NLR were analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients with MAP did not experience these complications. BISAP, modified Balthazar CT, Ranson, APACHE II and Marshall scores6 were calculated at baseline according to our clinical practice. The HCT, WCC, neutrophil count (NC), lymphocyte count (LC), LR and NLR were analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been stated that scoring systems such as BISAP, Balthazar CT, Ranson, and APACHE II, which usually combine symptoms and laboratory results to evaluate the patient’s condition, can be used to determine the severity of AP. However, they still need to be improved and perfected because of their complexity and low sensitivity67. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a fast, simple, and sensitive method to stratify patients at the time of admission or shortly thereafter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organ failure status was calculated using the Marshall score. In this scoring, if patients receive ≥ 2 points, they are accepted as having developed organ failure [12]. All patients with AP diagnosis were monitored and treated according to the evidence-based AP management guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology and American Pancreatic Association (IAP/APA) [13].…”
Section: Definition Of Acute Pancreatitis Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early complications i.e within 2 weeks of the attack are biliary obstruction, haemorrhage, extensive sterile necrosis, infection of the necrosis, peritonitis, multi-organ failure, deterioration, Wirsung rupture [31]. Variables found to be related to systemic complications were the APACHE II score as well as Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Marshall scores [32] greater than 3. The variables related to mortality were SOFA score > 3, leukocytic count > 19,000mm -3 , CRP > 19.5 mg/dL and length of hospital stay were related to necrotizing pancreatitis [33].…”
Section: Severity Of Ap Atlanta Criteria (1993) Atlanta Revision (2013)mentioning
confidence: 99%