2020
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1762560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severe vitamin D deficiency in preterm infants: possibly no association with clinical outcomes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16 A study found that vitamin D levels in the umbilical cord did not increase or decrease the risk of RDS (OR 1.044; 95%CI 0.349 to 0.88; P=0.0771). 17 Our study did not find a correlation between vitamin D deficiency and RDS. The RDS group had younger gestational age therefore leading this group to a higher risk of RDS.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…16 A study found that vitamin D levels in the umbilical cord did not increase or decrease the risk of RDS (OR 1.044; 95%CI 0.349 to 0.88; P=0.0771). 17 Our study did not find a correlation between vitamin D deficiency and RDS. The RDS group had younger gestational age therefore leading this group to a higher risk of RDS.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…In addition, Dogan et al (18) have confirmed that higher serum vitamin D levels in preterm infants can prevent NRDS. However, in contrast to this, in the latest prospective cohort study, when the cut-off value of 10 ng/ml was used, it was not found that the vitamin D status of preterm infants was related to NRDS, that is, the serum vitamin D level of preterm infants neither increased nor decreased the incidence of NRDS, which was contrary to the results of the above studies (21). Therefore, their relevance is still very controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Studies that evaluated the influence of vitamin D status on early respiratory outcome of very preterm infants have shown conflicted findings (15,(26)(27)(28). The makers used to define RDS severity and vitamin D deficiency varied between the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The makers used to define RDS severity and vitamin D deficiency varied between the studies. Some of them have found a high rate of RDS and markers of severe respiratory disease while others did not (15,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). Onwuneme C et al have found in a population of very preterm infants (GA <32 weeks) an association between vitamin D deficiency at birth [25(OH)D levels < 30 nmol/L] and clinical signs of acute respiratory morbidity with higher oxygen needs and a greater rate of MV in the delivery room and during the neonatal period (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%