are shown compared with simulation results in Figures 3(a) and 3(b), respectively.Measured electrical performances in the operating band are given in Table 1.From the simulated and measured results of Figure 3, the proposed BRFs using double spur-lines have compact structures, but it can provide high rejection and good matching characteristics at both pass and rejection bands, respectively. At these examples, although the separation between the highest point of Rx-band and the lowest point of Tx-band is just 6% in scale of fractional bandwidth, which means Tx-and Rx-band are closely separated from each other, fabricated filters show the rejection performance of more than 15 dB and the return loss performance of more than 20 dB. This is possible because the proposed filter structure can make a sharp slope by appropriately choosing the intersection point of the reflection and transmission curve given by L 2 .
CONCLUSIONSNovel BRF structures using double spur-lines were presented. Advantage of these structures is that planar BRFs can be easily and simply implemented into 50 X microstrip line itself without any additional elements, which can greatly reduces the circuit size. To check the validity of the structure proposed in this article, two kinds of BRFs, that is, Rx filter with Tx-band rejection and Tx filter with Rx-band rejection, were optimally designed and fabricated at Ku-band. The measured electrical performances made a good agreement with the simulated one. Because the proposed BRFs are compact and low cost, they will be useful for developing various BRFs embedded in microstrip-integrated circuits such as planar microstrip patch antenna and also could be widely used to improve TRx isolation of front-end filters in transceiver applications.