2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Settlement models, land use and visibility in rural landscapes: Two case studies in Greece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, they caused more dispersed rural building patterns (Fig. 3), which led to negative ecological consequences, such as landscape fragmentation (Miller et al 1996;Gonzalez-Abraham et al 2007b;Sevenant and Antrop 2007). From this point of view, it shows why environmental variables explained roads better than rural buildings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, they caused more dispersed rural building patterns (Fig. 3), which led to negative ecological consequences, such as landscape fragmentation (Miller et al 1996;Gonzalez-Abraham et al 2007b;Sevenant and Antrop 2007). From this point of view, it shows why environmental variables explained roads better than rural buildings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition to socioeconomic and cultural characteristics (Buntgen et al 2006), natural factors, including topography (Turner et al 1996), soil (Dale et al 1993), water and lakes (Schnaiberg et al 2002;Walsh et al 2003), visibility (Sevenant and Antrop 2007), and land cover (Hawbaker et al 2005;Martinuzzi et al 2007), largely control their densities and patterns at the regional and landscape scales (Banaszuk and Wysocka 1998;GonzalezAbraham et al 2007b;Jenerette et al 2007). Recently, roads and buildings have increased not only in urban and suburban areas, but also in rural areas with higher ecological values (Meigs and Sauber 2000;Schnaiberg et al 2002;GonzalezAbraham et al 2007b;Sevenant and Antrop 2007). Hence, understanding the temporal and spatial relationships between environmental factors and roads or buildings in rural areas is very helpful for the planning of roads and rural buildings and the restoration of the disturbed ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the changes in RSL has a long history that has focused predominantly on the size, pattern, and spatial distribution [6,12,16,17] of rural land consolidation [18][19][20] as well as sustainable management [21,22]. Recent studies have highlighted the driving forces behind rural settlement dynamics and have found that the distances to cities, roads, and water bodies as well as various terrain features have led to changes in the spatiotemporal distribution of RSL [2,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, for a long time, it was generally believed that RSL expansion was caused by rural population growth. In addition, although some research has been conducted on the coupling relationship between RSL and the RRP [17], analysis of the driving factors has been performed primarily at the national scale rather than at the watershed scale, especially in rural areas with oases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therewith, the above definitions may either guide us towards a subjective 'landscape' notion or towards an abstract articulate that the landscape is a 'place' , where 'place' could be defined by various researchers on the one hand as 'a personal connection created from experience, perception and value of the environment' (Green, 1999;Cheng et al, 2003;Sevenant and Antrop, 2007;Beza, 2010) or one's 'particular fusion of landscape and imagination' on the other hand (Ryden, 1993). Even if these landscape definitions insist on theorizing the way of seeing the land, by neglecting the social relations upon it, they dissociated the term landscape from its pure environmental notion, associating it with the 'place' notion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%