2012
DOI: 10.7189/jogh.01.010403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting research priorities to reduce global mortality from preterm birth and low birth weight by 2015

Abstract: Setting research priorities to reduce global mortality from preterm birth and low birth weight by 2015 Aim This paper aims to identify health research priorities that could improve the rate of progress in reducing global neonatal mortality from preterm birth and low birth weight (PB/LBW), as set out in the UN's Millennium Development Goal 4.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9][10][11][12] In fact, the comparisons are even harder because of the various definitions used to characterize prematurity and birth asphyxia. The present study used a birth weight less than 1500 g in addition to the gestational age, which was available for 97% of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12] In fact, the comparisons are even harder because of the various definitions used to characterize prematurity and birth asphyxia. The present study used a birth weight less than 1500 g in addition to the gestational age, which was available for 97% of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] One of the first steps to assist these newborns is inventing an inexpensive, fast, easy to use, and acceptable screening tool for health workers to identify at-risk babies. Various methods of anthropometry can be performed to diagnose preterm status in newborns, such as the circumferences of the chest, abdomen, head, and calf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows how the steering committee identified relevant research questions from existing Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative studies. [11][12][13][14][15][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The final list from the literature contained 45 research questions. Thirtyeight experts were then formally invited by email to participate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%