1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1984.tb00879.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting limits on children's behavior: The differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity

Abstract: The imposition of external constraints on an activity has frequently been shown to undermine intrinsic motivation. Given that limits must often be set upon peoples' activities, especially in parenting and education, the present study addressed the question of whether limits can be set without undermining intrinsic motivation for the activity being limited. Using cognitive evaluation theory, contrasting limit setting styles of either a controlling or informational nature, or no limits, were placed upon forty-fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
330
0
39

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 538 publications
(396 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
13
330
0
39
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, the investigations have identified the following three general factors: (a) support for autonomy (e.g., Deci, Nezlek, & Sheinman, 1981); (b) noncontrolling positive feedback (e.g., Ryan, 1982); and (c) acknowledging the other's perspective (e.g., Koestner et al, 1984). These factors are critical for promoting self-determination (i.e., for increasing the likelihood that an interpersonal context will be experienced as informational).…”
Section: Motivation Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the investigations have identified the following three general factors: (a) support for autonomy (e.g., Deci, Nezlek, & Sheinman, 1981); (b) noncontrolling positive feedback (e.g., Ryan, 1982); and (c) acknowledging the other's perspective (e.g., Koestner et al, 1984). These factors are critical for promoting self-determination (i.e., for increasing the likelihood that an interpersonal context will be experienced as informational).…”
Section: Motivation Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies document aspects of the SDT framework in educational contexts (e.g. see Table 1; Benware and Deci 1984;Burton et al 2006;Grolnick and Ryan 1987;Koestner et al 1984;Ryan and Grolnick 1986;Standage et al 2006;Tsai et al 2008). However, only few studies in this area have captured the hierarchical SDT model as a whole.…”
Section: Self-determination Theory: Research Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such research reveals that situational events known to facilitate intrinsic motivation produce greater interest (Harackiewicz, 1979;Ryan, Mims, & Koestner, 1983), more creativity (Amabile, 1979(Amabile, , 1982(Amabile, , 1983Amabile, Hennessey, & Grossman, 1986;Koestner, Ryan, Bernieri, & Holt, 1984;Kruglanski, Friedman, & Zeevi, 1971), more cognitive flexibility (McGraw & McCullers, 1979), better conceptual leaming (Benware & Deci, 1984;Grolnick & Ryan, 1987), and a more positive emotional tone (Garbarino, 1975) than events known to be controlling. The correlates and consequences of the various forms of extrinsic motivation have been less documented but appear to be less positive both in terms of affect and performance as the Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivational Styles 603 type of extrinsic motivation is less self-determined (see Deci & Ryan, 1985a, for a review).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%