2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2016.7510976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Set-covering-based algorithm for delay constrained relay node placement in Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract: The Delay Constrained Relay Node Placement (DCRNP) problem in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) aims to deploy minimum relay nodes such that for each sensor node there is a path connecting this sensor node to the sink without violating delay constraint. As WSNs are gradually employed in time-critical applications, the importance of the DCRNP problem becomes noticeable. For the NP-hard nature of DCRNP problem, an approximation algorithm-Set-Covering-based Relay Node Placement (SCA) is proposed to solve the DCRNP … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [14], [15], optimal relay placements and device-relay-channel associations were determined to achieve energy efficient uplink transmissions of IoT devices. The relay placement problem under a simplified delay constraint was investigated in [16]. Nevertheless, the above relay research works concentrated on static network states.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], [15], optimal relay placements and device-relay-channel associations were determined to achieve energy efficient uplink transmissions of IoT devices. The relay placement problem under a simplified delay constraint was investigated in [16]. Nevertheless, the above relay research works concentrated on static network states.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed methods for the deployment of RNs differ first and foremost in their objectives. As such, some of these methods aim to ensure only simple connectivity (1‐connectivity) . Other methods aim to reach k ‐connectivity ( k ≥ 2), which means, in the context of the problem at hand, that each SN has k disjoint paths to route its own data to the CNs, allowing the fault‐tolerance.…”
Section: Overview On the Use Of Rnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods aim to reach k ‐connectivity ( k ≥ 2), which means, in the context of the problem at hand, that each SN has k disjoint paths to route its own data to the CNs, allowing the fault‐tolerance. The connectivity objective is supported by two deployment modes: (i) reactive deployment, initiated after the loss of connectivity to re‐establish it, and (ii) proactive deployment, adopted to avoid any loss of connectivity …”
Section: Overview On the Use Of Rnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking the factory automation as an example, the data sensed by SNs is typically time-sensitive, such as alarm notification and information for feedback control, and thus the importance of receiving the data at the sink in a timely manner is noticeable (Liang et al, 2011;Zheng et al, 2015). However, the literature about the DCRNP problem are very limited Kumar, 2010, 2014;Nigam and Agarwal, 2014;Ma et al, 2016b;Sitanayah et al, 2014;Ma et al, 2016c). Kumar, (2010, 2014) first prove that the DCRNP problem is NP-hard, and a Shortest Path Tree based Iterative Relay Pruning (SPTiRP) algorithm is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%