Set-Based Prototyping with Digital Mock-Up Technologies

Toche, Boris; Pellerin, Robert; Fortin, Clément; Huet, Greg

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35758-9_26

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A special feature of the proposed method is the possibility of updating the analytical standard according to the actual physically existing prototype. Solving this task involves restoring the reference according to the scanned information about the portrait where prototyping technology can also be used according to the recommendations from [16]. However, if we compare the amount of information about the analytical benchmark of the prototype and its portrait, the latter contains information exclusively for the implementation of control operations, the volume of which is significantly less than is contained in the corresponding analytical standard.…”

Section: Discussion Of Results Of Studying the Accuracy Of The Geometry And Shape Of A Keelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, the verification of the proposed approach is not shown; no ways to associate it with the means of technological equipment are considered. An option to address this issue may be to use prototyping technology according to the recommendations given in [16]. In turn, the digital layout is built according to the analytical standard of the geometry and shape of an article, which is constructed according to the axioms of metric geometry of Euclid or Gilbert or Birkhoff [17].…”

Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Implementation of reengineering technology to ensure the predefined geometric accuracy of a light aircraft keel

Maiorova

Vorobiov

Boiko

et al. 2021

EEJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The subject of this research is the technology of reengineering and control of parts of aircraft objects (AOs) and technological equipment for their manufacture. The predefined accuracy of the keel of a light aircraft and molding surfaces of technological equipment for its manufacture has been ensured by using reengineering technology and CAD systems. A portrait of the actual physically existing keel of a light aircraft was built in the *.stl file format using the software Artec Studio (USA). The control and comparison of the geometry of the shapes of the analytical standard with the actual physically existing keel of a light aircraft based on its portrait have been implemented. The methods used are the analysis and synthesis of the experimental geometry of shapes, the method of expert evaluations. The following results were obtained: based on the analysis and synthesis, the presence of significant errors in the accuracy of the manufacture of the keel for a light aircraft in the range from −5.26 mm to +5.39 mm was detected. It has been shown that the key factor is the keel's relative plane indicator, which is outside the tolerance margin and is 85 %. It was decided to fabricate new technological equipment from another material – organic plastics. Control of the technological equipment made from organic plastics for the keel of a light aircraft showed that the shape-forming surfaces of the equipment have appropriate shapes and sizes corresponding to the existing analytical standard and are devoid of inaccuracies that occurred in the previous version. The range of keel margins that was made using the new technological equipment from organic plastics is from –0.51 mm to +0.34 mm while the relative plane of the keel outside the tolerance margin does not exceed 15 %. The study results showed the adequacy of the decisions taken, ensuring the predefined accuracy for the keel of a light aircraft and molding surfaces of technological equipment for its manufacture.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Of Results Of Studying the Accuracy Of The Geometry And Shape Of A Keelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of reengineering technology to ensure the predefined geometric accuracy of a light aircraft keel

Maiorova

Vorobiov

Boiko

et al. 2021

EEJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2011; Toche et al. 2012), it is argued by Toche (2017) that their ability to enable SBCE can be explored from a holistic PD perspective and by using a continuum of tools and methodology as they pertain to large-scale industrial conventional PD supporting frameworks such as PDM (including configuration management) and PLM. Similarly, although Digital Mock-ups (DMU), Functional DMU (FDMU) and industrial DMU (iDMU) extensively support the conventional industrial PDP (Lazzari & Raimondo 2001; Drieux 2006; Garbade & Dolezal 2007; Enge-Rosenblatt et al.…”

Section: Results From Content Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The same approach and gaps are present in Johannesson et al (2017). Since product modelling and configurable product models span multiple product development stages and domains (i.e., functional, technological, physical processes) (Wortmann & Erens 1995;Erens 1996;Andreasen, Hansen & Mortensen 1996;Männistö et al 2001;Huet et al 2011;Toche et al 2012), it is argued by Toche (2017) that their ability to enable SBCE can be explored from a holistic PD perspective and by using a continuum of tools and methodology as they pertain to large-scale industrial conventional PD supporting frameworks such as PDM (including configuration management) and PLM. Similarly, although Digital Mock-ups (DMU), Functional DMU (FDMU) and industrial DMU (iDMU) extensively support the conventional industrial PDP (Lazzari & Raimondo 2001;Drieux 2006;Garbade & Dolezal 2007;Enge-Rosenblatt et al 2011;Herlem et al 2012;Mas et al 2014), the prototyping (virtual and physical) and testing (including simulations) phases are also rarely used as actual means to enable the SBCE overlapping and decision-making process.…”

Section: The Post-second Toyota Paradox Publicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Set-based design: a review and new directions

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Set-based design (SBD), sometimes referred to as set-based concurrent engineering (SBCE), has emerged as an important component of lean product development (LPD) with all researchers describing it as a core enabler of LPD. Research has explored the principles underlying LPD and SBCE, but methodologies for the practical implementation need to be better understood. A review of SBD is performed in this article in order to discover and analyse the key aspects to consider when developing a model and methodology to transition to SBCE. The publications are classified according to a new framework, which allows us to map the topology of the relevant SBD literature from two perspectives: the research paradigms and the coverage of the generic creative design process (Formulation–Synthesis–Analysis–Evaluation–Documentation–Reformulation). It is found that SBD has a relatively low theoretical development, but there is a steady increase in the diversity of contributions. The literature abounds with methods, guidelines and tools to implement SBCE, but they rarely rely on a model that is in the continuum of a design process model, product model or knowledge-based model with the aim of federating the three Ps (People–Product–Process) towards SBCE and LPD in traditional industrial contexts.

show abstract

“…Therefore, in this case, it would be expedient to create an AE that would simplify control based on reverse engineering technologies by scanning a real existing experimental AE object and comparing the obtained portrait with the AS. The complexity of creating an AS is confirmed by work [11], which shows its construction according to the axioms of metric geometry of Euclid, Hilbert, or Kirchhoff. Today, reverse engineering technologies belong to a number of tools for solving the modern task of creating a virtual product, its production and control in a single information space.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Study of the features of permanent and usual reverse-engineering methods of details of complex shapes

Maiorova,

Kapinus,

Skyba

2024

TAPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The subject of the study is sustainable reverse engineering and conventional reverse engineering of aviation equipment (AE) samples. The object of the study is the geometric accuracy of the extracted portrait of a part of a complex shape in comparison with the constructed analytical standard (AS). The work is aimed at researching the methods of sustainable reverse engineering and conventional reverse engineering on the example of the digitization of the box of the AE steering machine, chosen as a part of a complex shape. For this, a portrait of the "*.stl" and AS format file was created and compared by performing a control operation with the determination of the time spent. A structural and technological analysis of the box of the AE steering machine was carried out, which showed that the box has through holes of various diameters (from 10 to 41.6 mm) and shapes (square, trapezoidal, round); thin walls between holes (up to 1.6 mm); right angles and their rounding radii (up to 1–4 mm); the thickness of the body walls is 2.4 mm, etc. 3D scanner – ARTEC SPACE SPIDER (Luxembourg) was selected and scanning was performed. According to the analysis of research methods of reverse engineering, it was established that the use of permanent and conventional reverse engineering allows, in the first case, to quickly manufacture a part by 3D printing or milling on CNC machines, and in the second case, to create its AS with the provision of the specified geometric accuracy. The difference in time between permanent and normal reverse engineering was 8 hours in favor of the former. Control of the ideal portrait according to the AS of the AE steering machine body showed the maximum deviations from –0.30 mm to +0.23 mm and the minimum deviations from –0.04 mm to +0.08 mm. The smallest indicators were observed on vertical and horizontal planes, and the largest - in cities with plane slopes, corners and small radii. This made it possible to establish that the existing capabilities of the Geomagic Design X software for correcting the received portrait of the "*.stl" format file currently do not guarantee the provision of geometric accuracy requirements (up to ±0.5 mm) for the manufacture of an experimental part of a complex shape – the AE steering machine body with 3D printing. The resulting ideal portrait can be used to manufacture a part by milling on CNC machines, taking into account deviations at the stage of process model formation, which can become the topic of further research.

show abstract

Set-Based Prototyping with Digital Mock-Up Technologies

Cited by 5 publications

References 6 publications

Implementation of reengineering technology to ensure the predefined geometric accuracy of a light aircraft keel

Implementation of reengineering technology to ensure the predefined geometric accuracy of a light aircraft keel

Set-based design: a review and new directions

Study of the features of permanent and usual reverse-engineering methods of details of complex shapes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About