2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2014.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sessile droplet contact angle of water–Al 2 O 3 , water–TiO 2 and water–Cu nanofluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As observed in our study, the sedimentation rate of the nanofluid systems strongly supports the previously established association of the nanoaggregate size with that of the sedimentation rate (Cieslinski and Krygier 2014). In our study, a settling of the NPs from the solutions to almost half their initial concentration was observed after a 30 min period.…”
Section: Heavy Crude Oilsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As observed in our study, the sedimentation rate of the nanofluid systems strongly supports the previously established association of the nanoaggregate size with that of the sedimentation rate (Cieslinski and Krygier 2014). In our study, a settling of the NPs from the solutions to almost half their initial concentration was observed after a 30 min period.…”
Section: Heavy Crude Oilsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The surfactant in turn affected the interactions between the nanoparticles by increasing repulsion forces between the SiO 2 NPs. The lack of surfactant at higher SiO 2 NPs concentrations indicates that the SiO 2 NPs produced larger SiO 2 nanoaggregates with larger-thansuitable diameters (Cieslinski and Krygier 2014;Ehtesabi et al 2014). The smaller diameters of nanoaggregates reported in previous findings were most likely the consequence of longer sonication times which yielded a more thorough mixture of the NPs into the suspension.…”
Section: Heavy Crude Oilmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Generally, sessile drop method, 36,54,55) captive bubble method, 38,56,57) environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) method 44,52,58,59) and gel trapping method 45,47) are direct methods. These methods obtain contact angles by observing the forming angles directly based on the theory of Young.…”
Section: Direct Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig. 3, there are many measurement methods that have been developed for particles: sessile drop method, [31][32][33][34][35][36][37] captive bubble technique, [38][39][40] Wilhelmy plate, 41) capillary rise method, 42,43) and some other new measurements, [44][45][46][47] all of the above are briefly described below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, wettability is not only the one criterion for improvement in lubrication performance; it also depends on several factors. Of such are bonding between the nanoparticles, particlefluid interactions and low range electrostatic force of interactions between the nanoparticles that depend on nanoparticle concentration and size [25]. The contact angle of the base oil is recorded as (34.98°) which is much higher compared to hybrid nano cutting fluid.…”
Section: Coefficient Of Friction and Contact Anglementioning
confidence: 98%