2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15672-4_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ServiceStore: A Peer-to-Peer Framework for QoS-Aware Service Composition

Abstract: Web service composition is to integrate component services for providing a value-added new service. With the growing number of component services and their dynamic nature, the centralized composition model can't manage them efficiently and accurately. In this paper, we proposed a distributed hash table (DHT)-based peer-to-peer (P2P) service composition framework, called ServiceStore. Compared with the central control in centralized model, in our ServiceStore, service selection and composition are distributed t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aiming at selecting a qualified web service for certain applications, efforts have been widely exerted in service location over P2P‐based systems . For example, in , they propose a distributed hash table‐based P2P service composition framework, called ServiceStore, for QoS‐aware service composition. In their ServiceStore, service selection and composition are distributed to the involved task brokers, requesting nodes, and service nodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming at selecting a qualified web service for certain applications, efforts have been widely exerted in service location over P2P‐based systems . For example, in , they propose a distributed hash table‐based P2P service composition framework, called ServiceStore, for QoS‐aware service composition. In their ServiceStore, service selection and composition are distributed to the involved task brokers, requesting nodes, and service nodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they decompose the global QoS constraint imposed on a given QoS property into the average values of that property associated with the services of each activity, which is not accurate and may discriminate a number of service candidates. A similar approach is presented by Jin et al [27]. The authors decompose global QoS constraints into local constraints using MILP, then they perform local selection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they decompose the global QoS constraint imposed on a given QoS property into the average values of that property associated with the services of each activity, which is not accurate and may discriminate a number of service candidates. A similar approach is presented by Jin et al [23]. The authors decompose global QoS constraints into local constraints using MILP, then they perform local selection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%