2016
DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1167862
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Service user and carer priorities in a Biomedical Research Centre for mental health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While expert advice is sought on 'prop' related issues and medical aspects of story trajectories this is not the case when it comes to more important matters concerning the function and role of medication, treatment and recovery. This risks ignoring vigorous and ongoing debates within the field of public mental health regarding service users and the burden of medication (Robotham et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While expert advice is sought on 'prop' related issues and medical aspects of story trajectories this is not the case when it comes to more important matters concerning the function and role of medication, treatment and recovery. This risks ignoring vigorous and ongoing debates within the field of public mental health regarding service users and the burden of medication (Robotham et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have shown that people living with severe mental health problems have an interest in research and setting research priorities (Robotham et al, 2016;Rose et al, 2008), have capacity to understand the complexities of consent process and what is being asked of them (Roberts et al, 2006), and have opinions on research quality in RCTs (Xia et al, 2009). In busy mental health services there is little capacity for practitioners to discuss research with clients, helping them to understand information sheets and weigh up whether they want to consent to join a study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short Form (CIDI-SF) modified to provide lifetime history had been used to identify cases and controls for some existing studies in the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, so modules from this were chosen to maximise the scope for international collaboration. 18,19 A service user advisory group at the National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the Maudsley was consulted over the design of the questionnaire and invitation 20 and it was piloted in nearly 15 000 people over 50 years old through an online platform. 21 Table 1 summarises the measures included in the MHQ and the suggested outcomes or phenotypes that can be derived.…”
Section: Questionnaire Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%