2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Service regime: An empirical analysis of innovation patterns in service firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
4
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chang et al, 2012) has obtained, we used a qualitative case-study approach (e.g., Yin, 2003). A qualitative research design arguably has advantages when the phenomenon to be studied is not well understood and the variables are still unknown (e.g., Meredith, 1998;Johnson and Harris, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chang et al, 2012) has obtained, we used a qualitative case-study approach (e.g., Yin, 2003). A qualitative research design arguably has advantages when the phenomenon to be studied is not well understood and the variables are still unknown (e.g., Meredith, 1998;Johnson and Harris, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively new research stream focusing on innovation practices in specific service industry contexts is thus emerging (Kuester et al, 2013), and recent contributions include analysis of innovation patterns (e.g., Chang et al, 2012) and success factors (Kuester et al, 2013) as well as the exploration of more detailed innovation practices in different service sectors such as experiential services (Zomerdijk and Voss, 2011) and nonprofit services (Barczak, Kahn, and Moss, 2006). The present study continues this research stream and examines innovation management practices in a specific subset of services that is quite different from both experiential and nonprofit services, namely production-intensive services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, process innovation reflected changes in the way an organization produces products or services (Dibrell et al 2008) such as new or significantly improved techniques, equipment and software (Gunday et al 2011). According to Chang et al (2012), process innovation was intended to safeguard and increase quality and decrease costs of production.…”
Section: Technological Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for the top management, in the highest level of the regional hierarchy, and very close to the strategic global level, what is innovation is not clear or at least not aligned with the innovation types as described in the OECD (2005, p. 14; p. 45-48), Chang, Linton and Chen (2012) as: innovation in product, innovation in process, innovation in marketing, organizational innovation (divided in structural innovation and procedural innovation), and innovation in business models. Their views about innovation concept are associated mainly to new product creation, and obtained essentially by resource and development (R&D) function or department.…”
Section: The Leadership Vision About the Innovation Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%