2021
DOI: 10.46223/hcmcoujs.soci.en.11.1.1905.2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Service quality in higher education: Applying HEdPERF scale in Vietnamese universities

Abstract: As the higher education sector is more competitive and globalized, service quality and student satisfaction are increasingly essential and attract more attention. However, research on this topic usually employed general service models applied for the higher education context. This paper investigates the service quality in higher education by combining the HEdPERF model and the popular two-dimensional service quality model to link the general and context-focused perspective. Data were obtained from 335 responde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning here that there have been arguments against the use of the SERVPERF, or more accurately, SERVQUAL dimensions, to evaluate service quality in the higher education sector (Abdullah, 2005; Brochado, 2009; Tri et al , 2021). Abdullah (2005) claimed that the Higher Education Performance-only (HEdPERF) model (non-academic aspects, academic aspects, reputation, access, programme issues and understanding) captured the authentic determinants of service quality within the higher education sector.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning here that there have been arguments against the use of the SERVPERF, or more accurately, SERVQUAL dimensions, to evaluate service quality in the higher education sector (Abdullah, 2005; Brochado, 2009; Tri et al , 2021). Abdullah (2005) claimed that the Higher Education Performance-only (HEdPERF) model (non-academic aspects, academic aspects, reputation, access, programme issues and understanding) captured the authentic determinants of service quality within the higher education sector.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%