Service Coalitions for Future Internet Services

Rubio‐Loyola, Javier; Merida-Campos, Carlos; Willmott, Steven; Astorga, Antonio; Serrat, Joan; Galis, Alex

doi:10.1109/icc.2009.5199454

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Virtual Private Network (VPN) [18] was proposed for supporting secure cooperation from different physical locations of the same company. Similar to [15], the objective in VPN is providing secure communication among members of the same coalition and therefore open cooperation is not the purpose of their design. A model for ad-hoc membership management was proposed in [13], [14].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An Autonomic Trust Management Framework for Secure Dynamic Coalition Cooperation

Abdi

2013

2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing and 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference On

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sharing resources and information in a secure fashion is a requirement for collaboration among distributed organizations. Proper access control mechanisms are required in order to manage access to those shared resources. A coalition provides a virtual space for collaborators to share their resources and interact with each other. To participate to a coalition, organizations must ensure that their resources are safe from inappropriate access while sharing specific resources with coalition participants. This paper presents a secure coalition framework based on a logic-based language, Subterfuge Safe Authorization Language (SSAL). In addition to the current rules in SSAL, we add two extra rules to provide the global unique interpretation for the permissions defined in the local policy of each coalition participant for accessing their resources. Our particular interest is introducing a distributed dynamic coalition framework that guarantees subterfuge freedom in cross coalition delegation of permissions. This allows to openly cooperate and share resources in a more secure manner.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…In CBAC a coalition is not presented by a unique identifier; therefore, open cooperation with other coalitions is impossible. A framework in service coalitions for future internet services was proposed in [15]. Form of administration is distributed as resource sharing decisions are taken by each participants (individual service provider).…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Autonomic Trust Management Framework for Secure Dynamic Coalition Cooperation

Abdi

2013

2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing and 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference On

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The latter ones may pass through locations with various access systems and technologies, namely areas with access points for local area network IEEE 802.11 (WiFi), wide area network fixed and mobile (IEEE 802. 16 and IEEE 802.16e, respectively) and regional area networks (i.e. IEEE 802.22-WRAN).…”

Section: Scenario Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Second, when AMSs change their policies or SLAs autonomously, leading to an incompatibility with the orchestration policies and SLAs. We have proposed two different negotiation approaches in the AutoI project: one based on coalition formation [16] and another based on bargaining [7]. Figure 4 shows an example of the operation of the negotiation Behaviour.…”

Section: Negotiation Behaviourmentioning

confidence: 99%

The AutoI approach for the orchestration of autonomic networks

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Existing services require assurable end to-end quality of service, security and reliability constraints. Therefore, the networks involved in the transport of the data must cooperate to satisfy those constraints. In a next generation Internet, each of those networks may be managed by different entities. Fur thermore, their policies and service level agreements (SLAs) will differ, as well as the autonomic management systems controlling them. In this context, we in the Autonomic Internet (AutoI) consortium propose the Orchestration Plane (OP), which promotes the interaction among different Autonomic Management Systems (AMSs). The OP mediates the communication and negotiation amongAMSs, ensuring that their SLAs and policies meet the requirement needed for the provisioning of the services. It also simplifies the federation of domains and the distribution of new services in virtualised network environments.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author’s final draft

show abstract

“…Section 3.2) incorporates support for the negotiation of agreements between AMSs [12]. Rubio-Loyola et al [43] propose an algorithm to negotiate service provider coalitions, for AutoI's OP. The algorithm is based on an electronic marketplace, where every service provider publishes its service offerings and associated guarantees.…”

Section: Agreement Negotiationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Federated management of the Future Internet: status and challenges

Famaey

Turck

2012

Int J Network Mgmt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYThe Internet's original static services have been superseded by rich multimedia services with stringent end-to-end QoS requirements. Additionally, there has been a trend from simple applications offered by a single provider, towards service compositions, managed across the bounds of multiple domains. It is widely accepted that the end-to-end requirements of multimedia and composed services cannot be satisfied by the current Internet, which does not support inter-domain collaboration. The network federation paradigm was advanced to address these limitations. It envisions the automatic negotiation and management of dynamic agreements between network domains, allowing them to collaborate to achieve goals they cannot achieve alone. This article presents an overview of state of the art research in the area of federated network management. Specifically, existing definitions are compared and aligned. Moreover, the most important efforts towards an architecture for a federated Future Internet are discussed. Finally, we have identified several important research challenges that need to be tackled before the federated Future Internet vision can be fully achieved. For each of these challenges, existing research efforts are surveyed and remaining open issues identified.

show abstract

Service Coalitions for Future Internet Services

Cited by 5 publications

References 12 publications

An Autonomic Trust Management Framework for Secure Dynamic Coalition Cooperation

An Autonomic Trust Management Framework for Secure Dynamic Coalition Cooperation

The AutoI approach for the orchestration of autonomic networks

Federated management of the Future Internet: status and challenges

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About