The AutoI approach for the orchestration of autonomic networks

Macedo, Daniel F.; Movahedi, Zeinab; Rubio‐Loyola, Javier; Astorga, Antonio; Koumoutsos, Giannis; Pujolle, Guy

doi:10.1007/s12243-010-0187-x

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 14 publications

(17 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This work is partially supported by the European Union through the Autonomic Internet (AutoI) [3], [40], the RESER-VOIR project [13] and the UniverSELF [41] project of the 7th Framework Program.…”

Section: Acknowledgmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Selection of Management/Monitoring Nodes in Highly Dynamic Networks

Clegg

Clayman

Pavlou

et al. 2013

IEEE Trans. Comput.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper addresses the problem of provisioning management/monitoring nodes within highly dynamic network environments, particularly virtual networks. In a network where nodes and links may be spontaneously created and destroyed (perhaps rapidly) there is a need for stable and responsive management and monitoring which does not create a large load (in terms of traffic or processing) for the system. A subset of nodes has to be chosen for management/monitoring, each of which will manage a subset of the nodes in the network. A new, simple and locally optimal greedy algorithm called Pressure is provided for choice of node position to minimise traffic. This algorithm is combined with a system for predicting the lifespan of nodes, and a tunable parameter is also given so that a system operator could express a preference for elected nodes to be chosen to reduce traffic, to be "stable", or some compromise between these positions. The combined algorithm called PressureTime is lightweight and could be run in a distributed manner. The resulting algorithms are tested both in simulation and in a testbed environment of virtual routers. They perform well, both at reducing traffic and at choosing long lifespan nodes.

show abstract

Section: Acknowledgmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Selection of Management/Monitoring Nodes in Highly Dynamic Networks

Clegg

Clayman

Pavlou

et al. 2013

IEEE Trans. Comput.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although the project's focus is on autonomic and self‐managing next‐generation service‐aware networks, it incorporates the federation aspect by supporting the management and sharing of resources across the bounds of administrative domains. The AutoI architecture is composed of five layers, the OSKMV planes : Virtualization plane . Virtualizes physical resources in order to support on‐the‐fly migration and reconfiguration of network resources. Management plane .…”

Section: Architectures and Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…AutoI's OP (cf. Section 3.2) incorporates support for the negotiation of agreements between AMSs . Rubio‐Loyola et al .…”

Section: Status and Challengesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although the project's focus is on autonomic and self-managing next-generation service-aware networks, it incorporates the federation aspect by supporting the management and sharing of resources across the bounds of administrative domains. The AutoI architecture is composed of five layers, the OSKMV planes [12]:…”

Section: Autonomic Internet Architecturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…AutoI's OP (cf. Section 3.2) incorporates support for the negotiation of agreements between AMSs [12]. Rubio-Loyola et al [43] propose an algorithm to negotiate service provider coalitions, for AutoI's OP.…”

Section: Agreement Negotiationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Federated management of the Future Internet: status and challenges

Famaey

Turck

2012

Int J Network Mgmt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYThe Internet's original static services have been superseded by rich multimedia services with stringent end-to-end QoS requirements. Additionally, there has been a trend from simple applications offered by a single provider, towards service compositions, managed across the bounds of multiple domains. It is widely accepted that the end-to-end requirements of multimedia and composed services cannot be satisfied by the current Internet, which does not support inter-domain collaboration. The network federation paradigm was advanced to address these limitations. It envisions the automatic negotiation and management of dynamic agreements between network domains, allowing them to collaborate to achieve goals they cannot achieve alone. This article presents an overview of state of the art research in the area of federated network management. Specifically, existing definitions are compared and aligned. Moreover, the most important efforts towards an architecture for a federated Future Internet are discussed. Finally, we have identified several important research challenges that need to be tackled before the federated Future Internet vision can be fully achieved. For each of these challenges, existing research efforts are surveyed and remaining open issues identified.

show abstract

Virtual Network Interfaces

Campista¹

2013

Virtual Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The AutoI approach for the orchestration of autonomic networks

Cited by 5 publications

References 14 publications

On the Selection of Management/Monitoring Nodes in Highly Dynamic Networks

On the Selection of Management/Monitoring Nodes in Highly Dynamic Networks

Federated management of the Future Internet: status and challenges

Virtual Network Interfaces

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About