Abstract:BackgroundIn colorectal cancer (CRC), the liver is the most common site of metastasis. Surgical resection represents the standard therapy for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, 5-year survival rates after resection do not exceed 50%, and despite existing preoperative stratification algorithms it is still debated which patients benefit most from surgical treatment. The soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) has recently evolved as a promising biomarker for distinct clin… Show more
“…Our data are in line with previous publications showing elevated suPAR serum levels in manifold cancers. Just recently, we demonstrated that concentrations of suPAR are elevated in patients with cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCA) [18] as well as in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) [34] or colorectal cancer (CRC) [20]. Notably, serum concentrations of suPAR in our cohort of patients with NET are numerically very similar to those found in CCA, PDAC and CRC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…suPAR was identified as a biomarker in patients with inflammatory and infectious diseases [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Moreover, a prognostic role for suPAR serum levels has been demonstrated in different cancers including pancreatic, cholangiocellular and colorectal malignancies [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. However, in NET no data on a potential role of circulating suPAR as a biomarker for prediction of patients’ prognosis or response to therapies have been reported so far.…”
Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) comprises heterogeneous tumors that are challenging to diagnose and, especially in cases of poorly differentiated (G3) NEN, are associated with very limited survival. Novel biomarkers allowing an early diagnosis as well as an optimal selection of suitable treatment options are urgently needed to improve the outcome of these patients. Recently, alterations of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) serum levels were described in various types of cancers. However, the role of circulating suPAR as a biomarker in patients with NEN is unknown. In this study, we measured suPAR serum levels in a large and well-characterized cohort of 187 patients with NEN (neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) n = 30; neuroendocrine tumors (NET), n = 157) as well as 44 healthy controls. suPAR concentrations were significantly elevated in patients compared to controls. However, suPAR concentrations were independent of tumor-related factors such as the proliferation activity according to Ki-67, tumor grading, TNM (TNM classification of malignant tumors) stage, somatostatin receptor expression or clinical features such as functional or nonfunctional disease and the presence of tumor relapse. Interestingly, suPAR concentrations in NET patients were similar when compared to those measured in NEC patients. In contrast to previous results from other malignancies, in our analysis suPAR levels were not a significant predictor of overall survival. In conclusion, our data suggests that suPAR serum concentrations are elevated in NEN patients but do not allow prediction of outcome.
“…Our data are in line with previous publications showing elevated suPAR serum levels in manifold cancers. Just recently, we demonstrated that concentrations of suPAR are elevated in patients with cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCA) [18] as well as in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) [34] or colorectal cancer (CRC) [20]. Notably, serum concentrations of suPAR in our cohort of patients with NET are numerically very similar to those found in CCA, PDAC and CRC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…suPAR was identified as a biomarker in patients with inflammatory and infectious diseases [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Moreover, a prognostic role for suPAR serum levels has been demonstrated in different cancers including pancreatic, cholangiocellular and colorectal malignancies [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. However, in NET no data on a potential role of circulating suPAR as a biomarker for prediction of patients’ prognosis or response to therapies have been reported so far.…”
Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) comprises heterogeneous tumors that are challenging to diagnose and, especially in cases of poorly differentiated (G3) NEN, are associated with very limited survival. Novel biomarkers allowing an early diagnosis as well as an optimal selection of suitable treatment options are urgently needed to improve the outcome of these patients. Recently, alterations of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) serum levels were described in various types of cancers. However, the role of circulating suPAR as a biomarker in patients with NEN is unknown. In this study, we measured suPAR serum levels in a large and well-characterized cohort of 187 patients with NEN (neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) n = 30; neuroendocrine tumors (NET), n = 157) as well as 44 healthy controls. suPAR concentrations were significantly elevated in patients compared to controls. However, suPAR concentrations were independent of tumor-related factors such as the proliferation activity according to Ki-67, tumor grading, TNM (TNM classification of malignant tumors) stage, somatostatin receptor expression or clinical features such as functional or nonfunctional disease and the presence of tumor relapse. Interestingly, suPAR concentrations in NET patients were similar when compared to those measured in NEC patients. In contrast to previous results from other malignancies, in our analysis suPAR levels were not a significant predictor of overall survival. In conclusion, our data suggests that suPAR serum concentrations are elevated in NEN patients but do not allow prediction of outcome.
“…12 SuPAR might also be an interesting circulating biomarker as recently shown for patients with sepsis 13 and cancer. [14][15][16] In BTC, preliminary data described a correlation between high tumoral uPAR expression and tumor invasion and metastasis. 17,18 However, there is insufficient data on a potential role of circulating suPAR as a biomarker in patients with BTC.…”
suPAR pre-OP Log-rank = 8.003 p = 0.005 2,500 Overall survival Circulating suPAR Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC) Highlights Biliary tract cancer is associated with poor outcomes and increasing incidence. Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment option for patients with biliary tract cancer. The identification of ideal surgical candidates has remained challenging. Circulating suPAR represents a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in resectable patients. SuPAR might be useful to identify patients with biliary tract cancer who will benefit most from tumor resection.
“…In liver malignancies, induction of uPAR was observed in colorectal liver metastases, whereas normal liver tissues showed very weak uPAR staining. However, serum suPAR levels increased after surgical resection of the tumor, suggesting that liver metastases are not a major source of circulating suPAR …”
Section: Cellular Source Of Supar In Liver Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that patients with suPAR levels >9.5 ng/mL at the beginning of the study progressed earlier to HCC; thus, they suggested that serum suPAR serves as a potential screening tool for the early diagnosis of HCC in patients with chronic liver disorders . In terms of liver metastases, Loosen et al measured suPAR levels in 104 patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. They found that the preoperative, but not postoperative, suPAR level was a prognostic factor for mortality.…”
Section: Elevation Of Supar Levels In Liver Diseasementioning
http://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2046-2484/video/14-5-reading-wei a video presentation of this article
https://www.wileyhealthlearning.com/Activity/6952102/disclaimerspopup.aspx questions and earn CME
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.