2017
DOI: 10.14740/jocmr2802w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum Free Light Chain Assay and κ/λ Ratio: Performance in Patients With Monoclonal Gammopathy-High False Negative Rate for κ/λ Ratio

Abstract: BackgroundSerum free light chain assay (SFLCA) and κ/λ ratio, and protein electrophoretic methods are used in the diagnosis and monitoring of monoclonal gammopathies.MethodsResults for serum free light chains, serum and urine protein electrophoreses and immunofixation electrophoreses in 468 patients with a diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy were compared. The results of the two methods were graded as concordant, non-concordant or discordant with the established diagnoses to assess the relative performance of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
47
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
4
47
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 360 samples analyzed, 201 samples (55.8%) had an abnormal κ/λ ratio and 118 samples (32.7%) had an abnormal sIFE appearance (presence of a monoclonal band). Of these 360 samples, 221 had agreement between sIFE and κ/λ ratio and 139 were discordant, with a statistically significant difference in favor of the κ/λ ratio (p <0.0001), which in agreement with what was reported by Milani, et al [22] but discordant with what reported by other authors [14,16,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 360 samples analyzed, 201 samples (55.8%) had an abnormal κ/λ ratio and 118 samples (32.7%) had an abnormal sIFE appearance (presence of a monoclonal band). Of these 360 samples, 221 had agreement between sIFE and κ/λ ratio and 139 were discordant, with a statistically significant difference in favor of the κ/λ ratio (p <0.0001), which in agreement with what was reported by Milani, et al [22] but discordant with what reported by other authors [14,16,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The mean value of κ/λ in the group which was positive for monoclonal gammopathy was higher than in the group which was negative for monoclonal gammopathy, with a significant difference (Table 4), as reported partially by Kuriakose, et al [26]. No significant difference was found concerning the association between sIFE results and light chain type, which indicates probably that there was no relative underdetection of lambda dominant κ/ λ ratio in our patients as suggested by some authors [14,15]. As the median values of blood creatinine were normal in both normal κ/λ patients and those with abnormal κ/λ ratios, this fact indicates probably an absence of kidney damage that would cause an under-estimation of this ratio [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As has been reported before, polyclonal increase in gamma globulins tends to favor immunoglobulins with kappa light chains and skewing of the κ/λ ratio in favor of kappa dominance [8, 11, 12, 23, 31]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This is further complicated by the under-recognition of lambda chains by SFLCA as has been presented earlier [12]. For example, at first encounter, 90% of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) lesions with lambda chain monoclonal protein (including those with IgG or other heavy chains) have a falsely normal κ/λ ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%